Research Papers

An Energy-Based Fouling Model for Gas Turbines: EBFOG

[+] Author and Article Information
Nicola Casari

Engineering Department,
University of Ferrara,
Via Saragat, 1,
Ferrara 44122, Italy;
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Imperial College London,
London SW7 2AZ, UK
e-mails: nicola.casari@unife.it; nicola.casari15@imperial.ac.uk

Michele Pinelli, Alessio Suman

Engineering Department,
University of Ferrara,
Via Saragat, 1,
Ferrara 44122, Italy

Luca di Mare

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Imperial College London,
London SW7 2AZ, UK

Francesco Montomoli

Department of Aeronautics,
Imperial College London,
London SW7 2AZ, UK

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received July 19, 2016; final manuscript received August 5, 2016; published online September 27, 2016. Editor: Kenneth Hall.

J. Turbomach 139(2), 021002 (Sep 27, 2016) (8 pages) Paper No: TURBO-16-1162; doi: 10.1115/1.4034554 History: Received July 19, 2016; Revised August 05, 2016

Fouling is a major problem in gas turbines for aeropropulsion because the formation of aggregates on the wet surfaces of the machine affects aerodynamic and heat loads. The representation of fouling in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is based on the evaluation of the sticking probability, i.e., the probability a particle touching a solid surface has to stick to that surface. Two main models are currently available in literature for the evaluation of the sticking coefficient: one is based on a critical threshold for the viscosity, and the other is based on the normal velocity to the surface. However, both models are application specific and lack generality. This work presents an innovative model for the estimation of the sticking probability. This quantity is evaluated by comparing the kinetic energy of the particle with an activation energy which describes the state of the particle. The sticking criterion takes the form of an Arrhenius-type equation. A general formulation for the sticking coefficient is obtained. The method, named energy-based fouling (EBFOG), is the first “energy”-based model presented in the open literature able to account any common deposition effect in gas turbines. The EBFOG model is implemented into a Lagrangian tracking procedure, coupled to a fully three-dimensional CFD solver. Particles are tracked inside the domain, and equations for the momentum and temperature of each particle are solved. The local geometry of the blade is modified accordingly to the deposition rate. The mesh is modified, and the CFD solver updates the flow field. The application of this model to particle deposition in high-pressure turbine vanes is investigated, showing the flexibility of the proposed methodology. The model is particularly important in aircraft engines where the effect of fouling for the turbine, in particular the reduction of the high pressure (HP) nozzle throat area, influences heavily the performance by reducing the core capacity. The energy-based approach is used to quantify the throat area reduction rate and estimate the variation in the compressor operating condition. The compressor operating point as a function of the time spent operating in a harsh environment can be in this way predicted to estimate, for example, the time that an engine can fly in a cloud of volcanic ashes. The impact of fouling on the throat area of the nozzle is quantified for different conditions.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Tabakoff, W. , 1987, “ Compressor Erosion and Performance Deterioration,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 109(3), pp. 297–306. [CrossRef]
Johnson, R. W. , and Casadevall, T. J. , 1994, “ Aviation Safety and Volcanic Ash Clouds in the Indonesia-Australia Region,” First International Symposium on Volcanic Ash and Aviation Safety, Seattle, WA, U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin, Vol. 2047, pp. 191–197.
Smialek, J. L. , Archer, F. A. , and Garlick, R. G. , 1991, “ The Chemistry of Saudi Arabian Sand: A Deposition Problem on Helicopter Turbine Airfoils,” Gordon Conference on Corrosion, New London, NH, July 14, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Cleveland, OH, Report No. NASA-TM-105234.
Wenglarz, R. , and Fox, R., Jr. , 1990, “ Physical Aspects of Deposition From Coal-Water Fuels Under Gas Turbine Conditions,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 112(1), pp. 9–14. [CrossRef]
Dunn, M. G. , 2012, “ Operation of Gas Turbine Engines in an Environment Contaminated With Volcanic Ash,” ASME J. Turbomach., 134(5), p. 051001. [CrossRef]
Ogiriki, E. A. , Li, Y. G. , Nikolaidis, T. , Isaiah, T. E. , and Sule, G. , 2015, “ Effect of Fouling, Thermal Barrier Coating Degradation and Film Cooling Holes Blockage on Gas Turbine Engine Creep Life,” Procedia CIRP, 38, pp. 228–233. [CrossRef]
Kurz, R. , and Brun, K. , 2001, “ Degradation in Gas Turbine Systems,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 123(1), pp. 70–77. [CrossRef]
Barker, B. , Casaday, B. , Shankara, P. , Ameri, A. , and Bons, J. , 2012, “ Coal Ash Deposition on Nozzle Guide Vanes—Part II: Computational Modeling,” ASME J. Turbomach., 135(1), p. 11015. [CrossRef]
Sreedharan, S. S. , and Tafti, D. K. , 2010, “ Composition Dependent Model for the Prediction of Syngas Ash Deposition With Application to a Leading Edge Turbine Vane,” ASME Paper No. GT2010-23655.
Singh, S. , and Tafti, D. , 2015, “ Particle Deposition Model for Particulate Flows at High Temperatures in Gas Turbine Components,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 52, pp. 72–83. [CrossRef]
Senior, C. , and Srinivasachar, S. , 1995, “ Viscosity of Ash Particles in Combustion Systems for Prediction of Particle Sticking,” Energy Fuels, 9(2), pp. 277–283. [CrossRef]
Brach, R. M. , and Dunn, P. F. , 1992, “ A Mathematical Model of the Impact and Adhesion of Microspheres,” Aerosol Sci. Technol., 16(1), pp. 51–64. [CrossRef]
Elghobashi, S. , 1994, “ On Predicting Particle-Laden Turbulent Flows,” Appl. Sci. Res., 52(4), pp. 309–329. [CrossRef]
Parker, G. , and Lee, P. , 1972, “ Studies of the Deposition of Sub-Micron Particles on Turbine Blades,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 186(1), pp. 519–526. [CrossRef]
Delimont, J. , Murdock, M. , Ng, W. , and Ekkad, S. , 2015, “ Effect of Temperature on Microparticle Rebound Characteristics at Constant Impact Velocity—Part I,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 137(11), p. 112603. [CrossRef]
Crosby, J. M. , Lewis, S. , Bons, J. P. , Ai, W. , and Fletcher, T. H. , 2007, “ Effects of Particle Size, Gas Temperature and Metal Temperature on High Pressure Turbine Deposition in Land Based Gas Turbines From Various Synfuels,” ASME Paper No. GT2007-27531.
Dykhuizen, R. , and Smith, M. , 1998, “ Gas Dynamic Principles of Cold Spray,” J. Therm. Spray Technol., 7(2), pp. 205–212. [CrossRef]
Legoux, J.-G. , Irissou, E. , and Moreau, C. , 2007, “ Effect of Substrate Temperature on the Formation Mechanism of Cold-Sprayed Aluminum, Zinc and Tin Coatings,” J. Therm. Spray Technol., 16(5–6), pp. 619–626. [CrossRef]
Morsi, S. , and Alexander, A. , 1972, “ An Investigation of Particle Trajectories in Two-Phase Flow Systems,” J. Fluid Mech., 55(2), pp. 193–208. [CrossRef]
Mücke, E. P. , Saias, I. , and Zhu, B. , 1996, “ Fast Randomized Point Location Without Preprocessing in Two- and Three-Dimensional Delaunay Triangulations,” 12th Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry, pp. 274–283.
Carnevale, M. , Wang, F. , Green, J. S. , and di Mare, L. , 2016, “ Lip Stall Suppression in Powered Intakes,” J. Propul. Power, 32(1), pp. 161–170. [CrossRef]
Arts, T. , Lambertderouvroit, M. , and Rutherford, A. , 1990, “ Aero-Thermal Investigation of a Highly Loaded Transonic Linear Turbine Guide Vane Cascade: A Test Case for Inviscid and Viscous Flow Computations,” NASA STI/Recon Technical Report No. 91.
Thompson, J. , 1997, “ Introduction to ‘Numerical Solution of the Quasilinear Poisson Equation in a Nonuniform Triangle Mesh’,” J. Comput. Phys., 135(2), pp. 126–127. [CrossRef]
Taltavull, C. , Dean, J. , and Clyne, T. W. , 2016, “ Adhesion of Volcanic Ash Particles Under Controlled Conditions and Implications for Their Deposition in Gas Turbines,” Adv. Eng. Mater., 18(5), pp. 803–813. [CrossRef]
Gislason, S. R. , Hassenkam, T. , Nedel, S. , Bovet, N. , Eiriksdottir, E. S. , Alfredsson, H. A. , Hem, C. P. , Balogh, Z. I. , Dideriksen, K. , Oskarsson, N. , Sigfusson, B. , Larsen, G. , and Stipp, S. L. S. , 2011, “ Characterization of Eyjafjallajökull Volcanic Ash Particles and a Protocol for Rapid Risk Assessment,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 108(18), pp. 7307–7312. [CrossRef]
Suman, A. , Kurz, R. , Aldi, N. , Morini, M. , Brun, K. , Pinelli, M. , and Spina, P. R. , 2015, “ Quantitative CFD Analyses of Particle Deposition on a Transonic Axial Compressor Blade, Part I: Particle Zones Impact,” ASME J. Turbomach., 137(2), p. 021009.
Guha, A. , 2008, “ Transport and Deposition of Particles in Turbulent and Laminar Flow,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 40(1), pp. 311–341. [CrossRef]
Reitzer, B. , 1964, “ Rate of Scale Formation in Tubular Heat Exchangers. Mathematical Analysis of Factors Influencing Rate of Decline of Over-All Heat Transfer Coefficients,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 3(4), pp. 345–348. [CrossRef]
Johnson, K. , Kendall, K. , and Roberts, A. , 1971, “ Surface Energy and the Contact of Elastic Solids,” Proc. R. Soc. London A, 324(1558), pp. 301–313. [CrossRef]
Wieland, C. , Kreutzkam, B. , Balan, G. , and Spliethoff, H. , 2012, “ Evaluation, Comparison and Validation of Deposition Criteria for Numerical Simulation of Slagging,” Appl. Energy, 93, pp. 184–192. [CrossRef]
Srinivasachar, S. , Helble, J. J. , and Boni, A. A. , 1991, “ An Experimental Study of the Inertial Deposition of Ash Under Coal Combustion Conditions,” Symposium (International) on Combustion, Elsevier, Vol. 23, pp. 1305–1312.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Computational procedure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Sticking evaluation procedure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison between different cases. References: 1 [24], 2 [16], 3 [15], 4 [17], 5 [18], and 6 [30].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison between different cases. References: 1 [17], 2 [15], 3 [16], 4 [24], 5 [18], and 6 [30].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Universal law for the activation energy variation with the temperature. References: 1 [24], 2 [16], 3 [15], 4 [17], 5 [18], 6 [31], 7 [31], and 8 [30].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Thickness distribution on the LS89 VKI blade—particle size 1 μm at T = 1800 K

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Thickness distribution on the LS89 VKI blade—particle size 25 μm at T = 1800 K

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Area variation as function of the concentration and the reduced temperature




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In