0
Research Papers

Investigation of Unsteady Flow Phenomena in First Vane Caused by Combustor Flow With Swirl

[+] Author and Article Information
Simon Jacobi

Osney Thermo-Fluids Laboratory,
Department of Engineering Science,
University of Oxford,
Oxford OX2 0ES, UK
e-mail: simon.jacobi@eng.ox.ac.uk

Cosimo Mazzoni, Budimir Rosic

Osney Thermo-Fluids Laboratory,
Department of Engineering Science,
University of Oxford,
Oxford OX2 0ES, UK

Krishan Chana

Whittle Laboratory,
Department of Engineering,
Cambridge University,
Cambridge CB3 0DY, UK

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received July 22, 2016; final manuscript received October 22, 2016; published online January 10, 2017. Editor: Kenneth Hall.

J. Turbomach 139(4), 041006 (Jan 10, 2017) (12 pages) Paper No: TURBO-16-1167; doi: 10.1115/1.4035073 History: Received July 22, 2016; Revised October 22, 2016

The flow at the combustor turbine interface of power generation gas turbines with can combustors is characterized by high and nonuniform turbulence levels, lengthscales, and residual swirl. These complexities have a significant impact on the first vanes aerothermal performance and lead to challenges for an effective turbine design. To date, this design philosophy mostly assumed steady flow and thus largely disregards the intrinsic unsteadiness. This paper investigates the steady and unsteady effects of the combustor flow with swirl on the turbines first vanes. Experimental measurements are conducted on a high-speed linear cascade that comprises two can combustors and four nozzle guide vanes (NGVs). The experimental results are supported by a large eddy simulation (LES) performed with the inhouse computational fluid dynamics (CFD) flow solver TBLOCK. The study reveals the highly unsteady nature of the flow in the first vane and its effect on the heat transfer. A persistent flow structure of concentrated vorticity is observed. It wraps around the unshielded vane's leading edge (LE) at midspan and periodically oscillates in spanwise direction due to the interaction of the residual low-pressure swirl core and the vane's potential field. Moreover, the transient behavior of the horseshoe-vortex system due to large fluctuations in incidence is demonstrated.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Lazik, W. , Doerr, T. , Bake, S. , Bank, R. , and Rackwitz, L. , 2008, “ Development of Lean-Burn Low-NOx Combustion Technology at Rolls-Royce Deutschland,” ASME Paper No. GT2008-51115.
Huang, Y. , and Yang, V. , 2009, “ Dynamics and Stability of Lean-Premixed Swirl-Stabilized Combustion,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 35(4), pp. 293–364. [CrossRef]
Lefebvre, A. , 1999, Gas Turbine Combustion (Combustion: An International Series), Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia, PA.
Alekseenko, S. V. , Kuibin, P. A. , and Okulov, V. L. , 2007, Theory of Concentrated Vortices, Springer, Berlin, pp. 309–378.
Anacleto, P. M. , Fernandes, E. C. , Heitor, M. V. , and Shtork, S. I. , 2003, “ Swirl Flow Structure and Flame Characteristics in a Model Lean Premixed Combustor,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 175(8), p. 136988. [CrossRef]
Syred, N. , 2006, “ A Review of Oscillation Mechanisms and the Role of the Precessing Vortex Core (PVC) in Swirl Combustion Systems,” PECS, 32(2), pp. 93–161.
Qureshi, I. , Smith, A. D. , and Povey, T. , 2012, “ HP Vane Aerodynamics and Heat Transfer in the Presence of Aggressive Inlet Swirl,” ASME J. Turbomach., 135(2), p. 021040. [CrossRef]
Qureshi, I. , Beretta, A. , Chana, K. S. , and Povey, T. , 2012, “ Effect of Aggressive Inlet Swirl on Heat Transfer and Aerodynamics in an Unshrouded Transonic HP Turbine,” ASME J. Turbomach., 134(6), p. 061023. [CrossRef]
Cha, C. M. , Hong, S. , Ireland, P. T. , Denman, P. , and Savarianandam, V. , 2012, “ Turbulence Levels are High at the Combustor-Turbine Interface,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-69130.
Cha, C. M. , Hong, S. , Ireland, P. T. , Denman, P. , and Savarianandam, V. , 2012, “ Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Combustor-Turbine Interaction Using an Isothermal, Nonreacting Tracer,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(8), p. 081501. [CrossRef]
Ames, F. E. , Wang, C. , and Barbot, P. A. , 2003, “ Measurement and Prediction of the Influence of Catalytic and Dry Low NOx Combustor Turbulence on Vane Surface Heat Transfer,” ASME J. Turbomach., 125(2), pp. 221–231. [CrossRef]
Salvadori, S. , Riccio, G. , Insinna, M. , and Martelli, F. , 2012, “ Analysis of Combustor/Vane Interaction With Decoupled and Loosely Coupled Approaches,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-69038.
Khanal, B. , He, L. , Northall, J. , and Adami, P. , 2013, “ Analysis of Radial Migration of Hot-Streak in Swirling Flow Through High-Pressure Turbine Stage,” ASME J. Turbomach., 135(4), p. 041005. [CrossRef]
Schildmacher, K. U. , and Koch, R. , 2005, “ Experimental Investigation of the Interaction of Unsteady Flow With Combustion,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 127(2), pp. 295–300. [CrossRef]
Dawson, J. R. , Rodriquez-Martinez, V . M. , Syred, N. , and O'Doherty, T. , 2006, “ The Effect of Combustion Instability on the Structure of Recirculation Zones in Confined Swirling Flames,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 177(12), pp. 2349–2371. [CrossRef]
Turrell, M. D. , Stopford, P. J. , Syed, K. , and Buchanan, E. , 2004, “ CFD Simulations of the Flow Within and Downstream of High Swirl Lean Premixed Gas Turbine Combustors,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53112.
Schluter, J. , Schonfeld, T. , Poinsot, T. , Krebs, W. , and Hoffman, S. , 2001, “ Characterization of Confined Swirl Flows Using Large Eddy Simulations,” ASME Paper No. 2001-GT-0060.
Takahashi, R. , and Ni, R. , 1990, “ Unsteady Euler Analysis of the Redistribution of an Inlet Temperature Distortion in a Turbine,” AIAA Paper No. 90-2262.
You, D. , Ham, F. , and Moin, P. , 2008, “ Large-Eddy Simulation Analysis of Turbulent Combustion in a Gas Turbine Engine Combustor,” Center for Turbulence Research, Annual Research Briefs, pp. 219–230.
Wang, P. , Bai, X. S. , and Wessman, M. , 2004, “ Large Eddy Simulation and Experimental Studies of a Confined Turbulent Swirling Flow,” Phys. Fluids, 16(9), pp. 3306–3324. [CrossRef]
Wang, S. , Yang, V. , Hsiao, G. , Hsieh, S. , and Mongiah, C. , 2007, “ Large Eddy Simulations of Gas-Turbine Swirl Injector Flow Dynamics,” J. Fluid Mech., 583, pp. 99–122. [CrossRef]
Hall, B. , Chana, K. , and Povey, T. , 2014, “ Design of a Non-Reacting Combustor Simulator With Swirl and Temperature Distortion With Experimental Validation,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 136(8), p. 081501. [CrossRef]
Cameron, C. , Brouwer, J. , Wood, C. , and Samuelsen, G. , 1989, “ A Detailed Characterization of the Velocity and Thermal Fields in a Model Can Combustor With Wall Jet Injection,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 111(1), pp. 31–35. [CrossRef]
Goebel, S. , Abuaf, N. , Lovett, J. , and Lee, C. , 1993, “ Measurements of Combustor Velocity and Turbulence Profiles,” ASME Paper No. 93-GT-228.
Roux, S. , Lartigue, G. , and Poinsot, T. , 2005, “ Studies of Mean and Unsteady Flow in a Swirled Combustor Using Experiments, Acoustic Analysis, and Large Eddy Simulations,” Combust. Flame, 141(12), pp. 40–54. [CrossRef]
Selle, L. , Benoit, L. , Poinsot, T. , Nicoud, F. , and Krebs, W. , 2006, “ Joint Use of Compressible Large Eddy Simulation and Helmholtz Solvers for the Analysis of Rotating Modes in a Industrial Swirled Burner,” Combust. Flame, 145(1–2), pp. 194–205. [CrossRef]
Wankhede, M. J. , Bressloff, N. W. , Keane, A. J. , Caracciolo, L. , and Zedda, M. , 2010, “ An Analysis of Unstable Flow Dynamics and Flashback Mechanism Inside a Swirl-Stabilised Lean Burn Combustor,” ASME Paper No. GT2010-22253.
O'Connor, J. , and Lieuwen, T. , 2011, “ Further Characterization of the Disturbance Field in a Transversely Excited Swirl-Stabilized Flame,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 134(1), p. 011501. [CrossRef]
Selle, L. , Lartigue, G. , Poinsot, T. , Koch, R. , Schildmacher, K. U. , and Krebs, W. , 2004, “ Compressible Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Combustion in Complex Geometry on Unstructured Meshes,” Combust. Flame, 137(4), pp. 489–505. [CrossRef]
Lubbock, R. , 2013, “ Fast Insertion Probes for Unsteady Temperature and Turbulence Measurements,” D.Phil. thesis, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Moss, R. , 1992, “ The Effects of Turbulence Length Scale on Heat Transfer,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Report No. OUEL 1924/92.
Zimmerman, D. R. , 1979, “ Laser Anemometer Measurements at the Exit of a T63-C20 Combustor,” NASA, Contract No. NAS 3-21267.
Barringer, M. D. , Richard, O. T. , Walter, J. P. , Stitzel, S. M. , and Thole, K. A. , 2002, “ Flow Field Simulations of a Gas Turbine Combustor,” ASME J. Turbomach., 124(3), pp. 508–516. [CrossRef]
Luque, S. , Kanjirakkad, V. , Aslanidou, I. , Lubbock, R. , and Rosic, B. , 2015, “ A New Experimental Facility to Investigate Combustor-Turbine Interactions in Gas Turbines With Multiple Can Combustors,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 137(5), p. 051503. [CrossRef]
Roach, P. , 1987, “ The Generation of Nearly Isotropic Turbulence by Means of Grids,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 8(2), pp. 82–92. [CrossRef]
Oldfield, M. , 2008, “ Impulse Response Processing of Transient Heat Transfer Gauge Signals,” ASME J. Turbomach., 130(2), p. 021023. [CrossRef]
Doorly, J. , and Oldfield, M. , 1987, “ The Theory of Advanced Multi-Layer Thin Film Heat Transfer Gauges,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 30(6), pp. 1159–1168. [CrossRef]
Piccini, E. , 1999, “ The Development of a New Heat Transfer Gauge for Heat Transfer Facilities,” D.Phil. thesis, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Denton, J. D. , 1983, “ An Improved Time-Marching Method for Turbomachinery Flow Calculation,” ASME J. Eng. Power, 105(3), pp. 514–521. [CrossRef]
Klostermeier, C. , 2008, “ Investigation Into the Capability of Large Eddy Simulation for Turbomachinery Design,” Ph.D. thesis, Cambridge University Engineering Department, Cambridge, UK.
Mazzoni, C. , Luque, S. , and Rosic, B. , 2015, “ Capabilities of Thermal Wall Functions to Predict Heat Transfer on the NGVS of a Gas Turbine With Multiple Can Combustors,” ASME Paper No. GT2015-43515.
Jacobi, S. , 2013, “ Influence of Lean Premixed Combustor Geometry on the First Turbine Vanes' Aerothermal Performance,” Master's thesis, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
SHARCNet, 2016, “ 10.1.8. Vortex Core Region, Lambda 2 Criterion,” University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Ansys/16.2.3/en-us/help/cfd_post/vort-core_details_v.html
Jeong, J. , and Hussain, F. , 1995, “ On the Identification of a Vortex,” J. Fluid Mech., 285(2), pp. 69–94. [CrossRef]
Richards, A. , 2015, “ University of Oxford Advanced Research Computing Facility,” Zenodo, European Organization for Nuclear Research, Geneva, Switzerland.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of unsteady interaction between residual swirl core and vane's potential field, and of unsteady nature of passage vortex

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

CAD (top) and photo (bottom) of the experimental facility's working section (view from downstream), including swirlers, transition ducts, and nozzle guide vanes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic of computational domain for steady CFD and LES; horizontal cut at midspan illustrating structured mesh for LES of swirler and vane passages

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Isosurface of total pressure obtained from instantaneous time step of LES

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Energy cascade of LES for two midspan points in the computational domain

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Turbulence intensity within transition duct and vane passages at midspan (time-averaged LES)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Dimensionless total pressure (top), yaw (middle), and pitch (bottom) distributions downstream of the transition duct; obtained through traverse measurements with installed swirler

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Dimensionless total pressure (top) and yaw (bottom) distributions downstream of the nozzle guide vanes; obtained through traverse measurements with installed swirler

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Pitchwise averaged dimensionless total pressure (left) and yaw (right) downstream of the nozzle guide vanes for experimental measurements (dashed) and time-averaged LES (solid) with swirler

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Schematic of interaction between residual swirl core and vane potential field (a) total pressure loss core in presence of vane potential field, (b) swirl, and (c) swirl reversed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Static pressure contour and stagnation line at unshielded vane's leading edge for a no-swirl (top), swirl (middle), and reversed swirl (bottom) case; based on steady CFD (a) no swirl, (b) swirl, and (c) swirl rev

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Dimensionless total pressure distribution at vanes trailing edges for swirl (top) and reversed swirl (bottom) scenario; streamtraces of residual swirl core and endwall boundary layer; steady CFD (a) swirl and (b) swirl reversed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Heat transfer coefficient distributions on the vanes suction surfaces obtained from experimental measurements (top) and steady CFD simulations (bottom) for a swirl (left) and reversed swirl (right) case (a) swirl and (b) swirl reversed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Wall shear stress on unshielded vane's suction surface for three time steps with isosurface of lambda 2 criterion (top); graph of wall shear stress for a point on the leading edge over time (bottom)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Discrete Fourier transformation of unshielded vane's temperature obtained from experimental thin-film gauge measurements on the pressure side (left), leading edge (middle) and suction side (right) for a no-swirl (top), swirl (middle), and reversed swirl (bottom) scenario

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Discrete Fourier transformation of unshielded vane's heat flux obtained from LES for point on the pressure side (left), leading edge (middle), and suction side (right) for the swirl scenario

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Isosurface of lambda 2 criterion in vane passages

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Unsteadiness of upstream pitchwise-averaged yaw

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Isosurface of lambda 2 criterion in vane passages; looking from downstream

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In