0
Research Papers

Laboratory Infrared Thermal Assessment of Laser-Sintered High-Pressure Nozzle Guide Vanes to Derisk Engine Design Programs

[+] Author and Article Information
Benjamin Kirollos

Osney Thermofluids Laboratory,
Department of Engineering Science,
University of Oxford,
Oxford OX2 0ES, UK
e-mail: ben.kirollos@eng.ox.ac.uk

Thomas Povey

Osney Thermofluids Laboratory,
Department of Engineering Science,
University of Oxford,
Oxford OX2 0ES, UK
e-mail: thomas.povey@eng.ox.ac.uk

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received July 26, 2016; final manuscript received August 26, 2016; published online January 18, 2017. Editor: Kenneth Hall.

J. Turbomach 139(4), 041009 (Jan 18, 2017) (12 pages) Paper No: TURBO-16-1173; doi: 10.1115/1.4035074 History: Received July 26, 2016; Revised August 26, 2016

The continuing maturation of metal laser-sintering technology (direct metal laser sintering (DMLS)) presents the opportunity to derisk the engine design process by experimentally down-selecting high-pressure nozzle guide vane (HPNGV) cooling designs using laboratory tests of laser-sintered—instead of cast—parts to assess thermal performance. Such tests could be seen as supplementary to thermal-paint test engines, which are used during certification to validate cooling system designs. In this paper, we compare conventionally cast and laser-sintered titanium alloy parts in back-to-back experimental tests at engine-representative conditions over a range of coolant mass flow rates. Tests were performed in the University of Oxford Annular Sector Heat Transfer Facility. The thermal performance of the cast and laser-sintered parts—measured using new infrared processing techniques—is shown to be very similar, demonstrating the utility of laser-sintered parts for preliminary engine thermal assessments. We conclude that the methods reported in this paper are sufficiently mature to make assessments which could influence engine development programs.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

HPNGV schematic (not to scale) from Ref. [3]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Laser-sintered vane pair dry assembly

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Laser-sintered vane pair assembly, glued and painted

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Per-row coolant capacity, normalized by total cast vane coolant capacity, at p0c/p0m  = 1.03

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Two-dimensional unwrapped schematic of working section in the Sector Facility

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of high-emissivity paints with rough/smooth TBC (microscope images)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Thermocouple temperature versus factory-calibrated black-body temperatures, for PS and SS. Black solid line is gradient of 1, intercept of 0.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Transmittance–emissivity product

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Surrounding radiance during a nominal Sector Facility run

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Gaussian weighting function for θ –  c regression for laser-sintered vane

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

SS and PS mainstream recovery ratio c for cast and laser-sintered vanes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Midspan mainstream recovery ratio distribution at 8.9% m˙cT0c/m˙mT0m

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

SS and PS overall cooling effectiveness θ for cast and laser-sintered vanes, normalized by maximum cast vane overall cooling effectiveness

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Midspan overall cooling effectiveness at 8.9% m˙cT0c/m˙mT0m, normalized by the maximum cast vane overall cooling effectiveness

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Overall cooling effectiveness at −78% S.D. and 8.9% m˙cT0c/m˙mT0m, normalized by maximum cast vane overall cooling effectiveness

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Overall cooling effectiveness at 95% S.D. and 8.9% m˙cT0c/m˙mT0m, normalized by maximum cast vane overall cooling effectiveness

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Overall cooling effectiveness at −3% S.D. and 8.9% m˙cT0c/m˙mT0m, normalized by maximum cast vane overall cooling effectiveness

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Individual overall cooling effectiveness measurements (40+ experiments per vane) at 18 points on the vane, normalized by maximum cast vane overall cooling effectiveness

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In