0
Research Papers

Influence of Combustor Swirl on Endwall Heat Transfer and Film Cooling Effectiveness at the Large Scale Turbine Rig

[+] Author and Article Information
Holger Werschnik

Mem. ASME
Institute of Gas Turbines and
Aerospace Propulsion,
Technische Universität Darmstadt,
Darmstadt 64287, Germany
e-mail: werschnik@glr.tu-darmstadt.de

Jonathan Hilgert

Institute of Gas Turbines and
Aerospace Propulsion,
Technische Universität Darmstadt,
Darmstadt 64287, Germany
e-mail: hilgert@glr.tu-darmstadt.de

Manuel Wilhelm

Institute of Gas Turbines and
Aerospace Propulsion,
Technische Universität Darmstadt,
Darmstadt 64287, Germany
e-mail: wilhelm@glr.tu-darmstadt.de

Martin Bruschewski

Institute of Gas Turbines and
Aerospace Propulsion,
Technische Universität Darmstadt,
Darmstadt 64287, Germany
e-mail: martin.bruschewski@uni-rostock.de

Heinz-Peter Schiffer

Professor
Mem. ASME
Institute of Gas Turbines and
Aerospace Propulsion,
Technische Universität Darmstadt,
Darmstadt 64287, Germany
e-mail: schiffer@glr.tu-darmstadt.de

1Corresponding author.

2Present Address: Universität Rostock, Institute of Fluid Mechanics, Albert-Einstein-Straße 2, Rostock 18059, Germany.

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received July 12, 2016; final manuscript received January 10, 2017; published online March 28, 2017. Editor: Kenneth Hall.

J. Turbomach 139(8), 081007 (Mar 28, 2017) (12 pages) Paper No: TURBO-16-1152; doi: 10.1115/1.4035832 History: Received July 12, 2016; Revised January 10, 2017

At the large scale turbine rig (LSTR) at Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany, the aerothermal interaction of combustor exit flow conditions on the subsequent turbine stage is examined. The rig resembles a high pressure turbine and is scaled to low Mach numbers. A baseline configuration with an axial inflow and a swirling inflow representative for a lean combustor is modeled by swirl generators, whose clocking position toward the nozzle guide vane (NGV) leading edge can be varied. A staggered double-row of cylindrical film cooling holes on the endwall is examined. The effect of swirling inflow on heat transfer and film cooling effectiveness is studied, while the coolant mass flux rate is varied. Nusselt numbers are calculated using infrared thermography and the auxiliary wall method. Boundary layer, turbulence, and five-hole probe measurements as well as numerical simulations complement the examination. The results for swirling inflow show a decrease of film cooling effectiveness of up to 35% and an increase of Nusselt numbers of 10–20% in comparison to the baseline case for low coolant mass flux rates. For higher coolant injection, the heat transfer is on a similar level as the baseline. The differences vary depending on the clocking position. The turbulence intensity is increased to 30% for swirling inflow.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Experimental setup, view into test rig on NGV stage and coolant injection (left), schematic of RIDN coolant flow path (right, top), main flow measurement planes (ME), and boundary layer measurement planes (RE); see also Fig. 5 and illustration of swirler clocking positions (right, bottom)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The auxiliary wall method [2]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Linear regression procedure for data evaluation at points A and B in Fig. 4

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Experimental results, AX inflow, MFR 3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Probes used for boundary layer measurements in the vicinity of the coolant injection in RE1-3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Mesh features of swirler, NGV LE, and TE (top), computational domain (bottom)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of experimental data and CFD results at turbine inlet plane (ME01), AX, SWP and SWL inflow, pitchwise average, MFR 3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Coolant streamlines for AX, MFR 3, CFD result

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Boundary layer in RE1, AX, MFR 3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Boundary layer influence of RIDN injection for AX, MFR 3, view from downstream

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Circumferential averages of turbulence intensities at the turbine inlet plane (ME01) obtained by hot-wire for AX, SWP, SWL

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Turbulence intensity, view downstream on the turbine inlet plane (ME01), HWA data for SWP inflow, MFR 3. SWL shows a similar shifted peak off the swirler axis.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Experimental results for SWP (top) and SWL (bottom) inflow, MFR 3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Mach number in turbine inlet plane (ME01), SWP (top) and SWL (bottom) inflow, MFR 3, HWA data

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Nusselt numbers, SWL clocking, MFR 0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Area-averaged results, normalized to values at AX inflow, MFR 0.8

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Comparison of IR and gas concentration data, AX MFR3

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In