Experimental Study on Pressure Losses in Circular Orifices with Inlet Cross Flow

[+] Author and Article Information
Daniel Feseker

Werkzeugbau Siegfried Hofmann GmbH, Lichtenfels, Germany

Mats Kinell

Siemens Industrial Turbomachinery AB, Finspång, Sweden

Matthias Neef

Faculty of Mechanical and Process Engineering University of Applied Sciences Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

1Corresponding author.

ASME doi:10.1115/1.4039842 History: Received February 27, 2018; Revised March 25, 2018


The ability to understand and predict the pressure losses of orifices is important in order to improve the air flow within the secondary air system. This experimental study investigates the behavior of the discharge coefficient for circular orifices with inlet cross flow which is a common flow case in gas turbines. Examples of this are at the inlet of a film cooling hole or the feeding of air to a blade through an orifice in a rotor disc. Measurements were conducted for a total number of 38 orifices, covering a wide range of length-to-diameter ratios, including short and long orifices with varying inlet geometries. Up to five different chamfer-to-diameter and radius-to-diameter ratios were tested per orifice length. Furthermore, the static pressure ratio across the orifice was varied between 1.05 and 1.6 for all examined orifices. The results of this comprehensive investigation demonstrate the beneficial influence of rounded inlet geometries and the ability to decrease pressure losses, which is especially true for higher cross flow ratios where the reduction of the pressure loss in comparison to sharp edged holes can be as high as 54%. With some exceptions, the chamfered orifices show a similar behavior as the rounded ones but with generally lower discharge coefficients. Nevertheless, a chamfered inlet yields lower pressure losses than a sharp edged inlet. The obtained experimental data was used to develop two correlations for the discharge coefficient as a function of geometrical as well as flow properties.

Siemens AG
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.






Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In