In turbine blade systems, under-platform dampers are widely used to attenuate excessive resonant vibrations. Subjected to vibration excitation, the components with frictionally constrained interfaces can involve very complex contact kinematics induced by tangential and normal relative motions. To effectively calculate the dynamics of a blade-damper system, contact models which can accurately reproduce the interface normal and tangential motions are required. The large majority of works have been developed using macroslip friction models to model the friction damping at the contact interface. However, for those cases with small tangential displacement where high normal loads are applied, macroslip models are not enough to give accurate results. In this paper two recently published microslip models are compared, between them and against the simple macroslip spring-slider model. The aim is to find to which extent these models can accurately predict damper mechanics. One model is the so called GG array, where an array of macroslip elements is used. Each macroslip element of the GG array is assigned its own contact parameters and for each of them four parameters are needed: normal stiffness, tangential stiffness, normal gap and friction coefficient. The other one is a novel continuous microslip friction model. The model is based on a modification of the original classic IWAN model to couple normal and tangential contact loads. Like the GG array the model needs normal and tangential stiffness, and friction coefficient. Unlike the GG array the model is continuous and, instead of the normal gap required by the GG array, the Modified IWAN model needs a preload value. The two models are here applied to the study of the mechanics of a laboratory under-platform damper test rig. The results from the two models are compared and allow their difference, both for damper mechanics and for the complex-spring coefficients, to be assessed.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME Turbo Expo 2018: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition
June 11–15, 2018
Oslo, Norway
Conference Sponsors:
- International Gas Turbine Institute
ISBN:
978-0-7918-5115-9
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
A Comparison of Two Microslip Contact Models for Studying the Mechanics of Underplatform Dampers
Chao Xu,
Chao Xu
Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Dongwu Li,
Dongwu Li
Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Muzio M. Gola,
Muzio M. Gola
Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Chiara Gastaldi
Chiara Gastaldi
Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
Chao Xu
Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, China
Dongwu Li
Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an, China
Muzio M. Gola
Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy
Chiara Gastaldi
Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy
Paper No:
GT2018-76007, V07CT35A021; 8 pages
Published Online:
August 30, 2018
Citation
Xu, C, Li, D, Gola, MM, & Gastaldi, C. "A Comparison of Two Microslip Contact Models for Studying the Mechanics of Underplatform Dampers." Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2018: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. Volume 7C: Structures and Dynamics. Oslo, Norway. June 11–15, 2018. V07CT35A021. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2018-76007
Download citation file:
54
Views
0
Citations
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
On Nonlinear Forced Vibration of Shrouded Turbine Blades
J. Turbomach (January,2008)
Effects of Contact Interface Parameters on Vibration of Turbine Bladed Disks With Underplatform Dampers
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (March,2012)
Characterization of Turbine Blade Friction Dampers
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (October,2005)
Related Chapters
Smart Semi-Active Control of Floor-Isolated Structures
Intelligent Engineering Systems Through Artificial Neural Networks, Volume 17
Research on Autobody Panels Developmental Technology Based on Reverse Engineering
Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Mechanical, Industrial, and Manufacturing Technologies (MIMT 2010)
Fluidelastic Instability of Tube Bundles in Single-Phase Flow
Flow-Induced Vibration Handbook for Nuclear and Process Equipment