1-20 of 182
Rupture
Close
Save search
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Proceedings Papers

Probabilistic Analysis Applied to the Risk of SCC Failure

Scott Riccardella, Owen Malinowski, Pete Riccardella, Steve Potts, Sean Moran, Kelly Thompson, Ann Reo
Proc. ASME. IPC2022, Volume 1: Pipeline Safety Management Systems; Project Management, Design, Construction, and Environmental Issues; Strain-Based Design and Assessment; Risk and Reliability; Emerging Fuels and Greenhouse Gas Emissions, V001T07A005, September 26–30, 2022
Paper No: IPC2022-86906
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2022-86906
View Paper titled, Probabilistic Analysis Applied to the Risk of SCC Failure
Open the PDF for Probabilistic Analysis Applied to the Risk of SCC Failure in another window
Topics: Artificial neural networks, Failure, Machine learning, Risk, Probability, Algorithms, Coating processes, Coatings, Compressors, Fracture mechanics
Proceedings Papers

A Prudent Approach to Evaluate Dig Effectiveness

Aaron Schartner, Aaron Woo, Dushyant Puri, Shahani Kariyawasam
Proc. ASME. IPC2020, Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity, V001T03A062, September 28–30, 2020
Paper No: IPC2020-9520
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2020-9520
View Paper titled, A Prudent Approach to Evaluate Dig Effectiveness
Open the PDF for A Prudent Approach to Evaluate Dig Effectiveness in another window
Topics: Corrosion, Ditches, Industrial research, Inspection, Leakage, Maintenance, Optimization, Pipelines, Reliability, Rupture
Proceedings Papers

An Onshore Pipeline Failure due to Hydrogen Assisted Cracking Induced by Cathodic Protection Operated at Near -1200 mV CSE: A Case Study

Pablo Cazenave, Ming Gao, Andrea Moneta, Juan Cruzado, Pedro Hryciuk
Proc. ASME. IPC2020, Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity, V001T03A071, September 28–30, 2020
Paper No: IPC2020-9396
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2020-9396
View Paper titled, An Onshore Pipeline Failure due to Hydrogen Assisted Cracking Induced by Cathodic Protection Operated at Near -1200 mV CSE: A Case Study
Open the PDF for An Onshore Pipeline Failure due to Hydrogen Assisted Cracking Induced by Cathodic Protection Operated at Near -1200 mV CSE: A Case Study in another window
Topics: Cathodic protection, Cracking (Materials), Failure, Fracture (Process), Hydrogen, Pipelines, Rupture, Fracture (Materials), Root cause analysis, Copper
Proceedings Papers

Assessment of Societal Risks Associated With Large Gas Transmission Pipeline Systems

Dongliang Lu, Alex Tomic, Shahani Kariyawasam
Proc. ASME. IPC2020, Volume 2: Pipeline Safety Management Systems; Project Management, Design, Construction, and Environmental Issues; Strain Based Design; Risk and Reliability; Northern, Offshore, and Production Pipelines, V002T07A015, September 28–30, 2020
Paper No: IPC2020-9507
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2020-9507
View Paper titled, Assessment of Societal Risks Associated With Large Gas Transmission Pipeline Systems
Open the PDF for Assessment of Societal Risks Associated With Large Gas Transmission Pipeline Systems in another window
Topics: Pipeline systems, Risk, Pipelines, Risk assessment, Natural gas distribution, Computer software, Hazards, Pipeline integrity management, Risk analysis, Rupture
Proceedings Papers

Liquid Pipeline Rupture Detection Using Multiple Artificial Intelligence Classifiers During Steady-State and Transient Operations

Christopher MacDonald, Michael Yang, Shawn Learn, Ron Hugo, Simon Park
Proc. ASME. IPC2020, Volume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and Joining, V003T04A002, September 28–30, 2020
Paper No: IPC2020-9237
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2020-9237
View Paper titled, Liquid Pipeline Rupture Detection Using Multiple Artificial Intelligence Classifiers During Steady-State and Transient Operations
Open the PDF for Liquid Pipeline Rupture Detection Using Multiple Artificial Intelligence Classifiers During Steady-State and Transient Operations in another window
Topics: Artificial intelligence, Pipelines, Rupture, Steady state, Transients (Dynamics)
Proceedings Papers

An Engineering Assessment Methodology to Evaluate Arc Burns

Alireza Kohandehghan, Jonathan Prescott, Stuart Guest, Sean Lepine
Proc. ASME. IPC2020, Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity, V001T03A021, September 28–30, 2020
Paper No: IPC2020-9506
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2020-9506
View Paper titled, An Engineering Assessment Methodology to Evaluate Arc Burns
Open the PDF for An Engineering Assessment Methodology to Evaluate Arc Burns in another window
Topics: Brittle fracture, Clamps (Tools), Collapse, Cooling, Cracking (Materials), Dimensions, Electric arcs, Electrodes, Etching, Fatigue analysis
Proceedings Papers

A More Accurate and Precise Method for Large Metal Loss Corrosion Assessment

Shenwei Zhang, Jason Yan, Shahani Kariyawasam, Terry Huang, Mohammad Al-Amin
Proc. ASME. IPC2018, Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity, V001T03A059, September 24–28, 2018
Paper No: IPC2018-78233
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78233
View Paper titled, A More Accurate and Precise Method for Large Metal Loss Corrosion Assessment
Open the PDF for A More Accurate and Precise Method for Large Metal Loss Corrosion Assessment in another window
Topics: Corrosion, Metals, Pipelines, Brain, Cutting, Lasers, Maintenance, Safety, Shapes, Tumors
Proceedings Papers

Girth Weld Strength Matching Effect on Tensile Strain Capacity of Grade X70 High Strain Line Pipe

Hisakazu Tajika, Takahiro Sakimoto, Tsunehisa Handa, Rinsei Ikeda, Joe Kondo
Proc. ASME. IPC2018, Volume 2: Pipeline Safety Management Systems; Project Management, Design, Construction, and Environmental Issues; Strain Based Design; Risk and Reliability; Northern Offshore and Production Pipelines, V002T06A005, September 24–28, 2018
Paper No: IPC2018-78778
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78778
View Paper titled, Girth Weld Strength Matching Effect on Tensile Strain Capacity of Grade X70 High Strain Line Pipe
Open the PDF for Girth Weld Strength Matching Effect on Tensile Strain Capacity of Grade X70 High Strain Line Pipe in another window
Topics: Pipes, Buckling, Pipelines, Deformation, Pipe bending, Rupture, Design, Electrical discharge machining, Gas metal arc welding, Gas tungsten arc welding
Proceedings Papers

Development of Reliability-Based Criteria for Corrosion Assessment

Riski Adianto, Maher Nessim, Dongliang Lu
Proc. ASME. IPC2018, Volume 2: Pipeline Safety Management Systems; Project Management, Design, Construction, and Environmental Issues; Strain Based Design; Risk and Reliability; Northern Offshore and Production Pipelines, V002T07A023, September 24–28, 2018
Paper No: IPC2018-78605
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78605
View Paper titled, Development of Reliability-Based Criteria for Corrosion Assessment
Open the PDF for Development of Reliability-Based Criteria for Corrosion Assessment in another window
Topics: Corrosion, Reliability, Pipelines, Safety, Failure, Leakage, Pressure, Probability, Density, Design
Proceedings Papers

System Wide Risk Assessment in the 21 st Century: TransCanada’s Approach

Aleksandar Tomic, Terry Huang, Shahani Kariyawasam
Proc. ASME. IPC2018, Volume 2: Pipeline Safety Management Systems; Project Management, Design, Construction, and Environmental Issues; Strain Based Design; Risk and Reliability; Northern Offshore and Production Pipelines, V002T07A024, September 24–28, 2018
Paper No: IPC2018-78657
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78657
View Paper titled, System Wide Risk Assessment in the 21 st Century: TransCanada’s Approach
Open the PDF for System Wide Risk Assessment in the 21 st Century: TransCanada’s Approach in another window
Topics: Risk assessment, Risk, Failure, Cycles, Decision making, Failure analysis, Inspection, Maintenance, Pipelines, Regulations
Proceedings Papers

Fracture Toughness Testing and its Implications to Engineering Fracture Mechanics Analysis of Energy Pipelines

Sergio Limon, Peter Martin, Mike Barnum, Robert Pilarczyk
Proc. ASME. IPC2018, Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity, V001T03A077, September 24–28, 2018
Paper No: IPC2018-78723
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78723
View Paper titled, Fracture Toughness Testing and its Implications to Engineering Fracture Mechanics Analysis of Energy Pipelines
Open the PDF for Fracture Toughness Testing and its Implications to Engineering Fracture Mechanics Analysis of Energy Pipelines in another window
Topics: Fracture mechanics, Fracture toughness, Pipelines, Testing, Fracture (Materials), Fracture (Process), Brittleness, Carbon steel, Failure, Failure mechanisms
Proceedings Papers

An ILI Based Program That Prevents Reoccurrence of Post ILI Failures Seen in Industry

Terry Huang, Shahani Kariyawasam
Proc. ASME. IPC2018, Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity, V001T03A053, September 24–28, 2018
Paper No: IPC2018-78604
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78604
View Paper titled, An ILI Based Program That Prevents Reoccurrence of Post ILI Failures Seen in Industry
Open the PDF for An ILI Based Program That Prevents Reoccurrence of Post ILI Failures Seen in Industry in another window
Topics: Failure, Corrosion, Pipelines, Uncertainty, Inspection, Resolution (Optics), Rupture
Proceedings Papers

Validate Crack Assessment Models With In-Service and Hydrotest Failures

Jason Yan, Shenwei Zhang, Shahani Kariyawasam, Maria Pino, Taojun Liu
Proc. ASME. IPC2018, Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity, V001T03A005, September 24–28, 2018
Paper No: IPC2018-78251
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78251
View Paper titled, Validate Crack Assessment Models With In-Service and Hydrotest Failures
Open the PDF for Validate Crack Assessment Models With In-Service and Hydrotest Failures in another window
Topics: Failure, Fracture (Materials), Pipelines, Hydrostatic testing, Safety, Accuracy and precision, Pressure, Rupture, American Petroleum Institute, Boundary-value problems
Proceedings Papers

An Analysis Model and its Practical Applications in PG&E Gas Transmission Pipeline Strength Test Projects

Chunlei He, Edward Stracke
Proc. ASME. IPC2018, Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity, V001T03A047, September 24–28, 2018
Paper No: IPC2018-78255
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78255
View Paper titled, An Analysis Model and its Practical Applications in PG&E Gas Transmission Pipeline Strength Test Projects
Open the PDF for An Analysis Model and its Practical Applications in PG&E Gas Transmission Pipeline Strength Test Projects in another window
Topics: Pipelines, Nitrogen, Pressure, Temperature, Leakage, Water, Engineers, Helium, Regulations, Rupture
Proceedings Papers

Crack Shape Development for Leak-Before-Break Analysis in Pipelines

Kathy Zhang, Luyao Xu, James Ferguson, Dennis Zadery
Proc. ASME. IPC2018, Volume 1: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity, V001T03A071, September 24–28, 2018
Paper No: IPC2018-78587
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78587
View Paper titled, Crack Shape Development for Leak-Before-Break Analysis in Pipelines
Open the PDF for Crack Shape Development for Leak-Before-Break Analysis in Pipelines in another window
Topics: Fracture (Materials), Leak-before-break, Pipelines, Shapes, Fatigue, Leakage, Fitness-for-service, Geometry, Pressure, American Petroleum Institute
Proceedings Papers

Development of Empirical Method to Calculate Natural Gas Pipelines Rupture Exposure Radius

Abdulaziz N. Ababtain, Arafat M. Aloqaily
Proc. ASME. IPC2018, Volume 2: Pipeline Safety Management Systems; Project Management, Design, Construction, and Environmental Issues; Strain Based Design; Risk and Reliability; Northern Offshore and Production Pipelines, V002T07A012, September 24–28, 2018
Paper No: IPC2018-78272
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78272
View Paper titled, Development of Empirical Method to Calculate Natural Gas Pipelines Rupture Exposure Radius
Open the PDF for Development of Empirical Method to Calculate Natural Gas Pipelines Rupture Exposure Radius in another window
Topics: Natural gas distribution, Rupture, Pipelines, Modeling, Valves, Computational methods, Emergencies, Safety, Wall thickness, Computer software
Proceedings Papers

Effective Risk Management for In Service Pipelines: Achieving ALARP by Pressure Management and Slab Protection

Francis Carroll, Jan Hayes
Proc. ASME. IPC2018, Volume 2: Pipeline Safety Management Systems; Project Management, Design, Construction, and Environmental Issues; Strain Based Design; Risk and Reliability; Northern Offshore and Production Pipelines, V002T07A005, September 24–28, 2018
Paper No: IPC2018-78170
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78170
View Paper titled, Effective Risk Management for In Service Pipelines: Achieving ALARP by Pressure Management and Slab Protection
Open the PDF for Effective Risk Management for In Service Pipelines: Achieving ALARP by Pressure Management and Slab Protection in another window
Topics: Pipelines, Pressure, Risk management, Slabs, Risk, Safety, Augers, Cities, Density, Design
Proceedings Papers

Strengthening the Current Class Location Designation System

Diana Willson, Iain Colquhoun, Dean Carnes
Proc. ASME. IPC2018, Volume 2: Pipeline Safety Management Systems; Project Management, Design, Construction, and Environmental Issues; Strain Based Design; Risk and Reliability; Northern Offshore and Production Pipelines, V002T02A013, September 24–28, 2018
Paper No: IPC2018-78672
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78672
View Paper titled, Strengthening the Current Class Location Designation System
Open the PDF for Strengthening the Current Class Location Designation System in another window
Topics: Cities, Corrosion, Damage, Density, Design, Failure, Hazards, Pipeline systems, Pipelines, Pipes
Proceedings Papers

Limit States Design Checks for Geotechnical Loads

Maher A. Nessim, Smitha D. Koduru
Proc. ASME. IPC2018, Volume 2: Pipeline Safety Management Systems; Project Management, Design, Construction, and Environmental Issues; Strain Based Design; Risk and Reliability; Northern Offshore and Production Pipelines, V002T07A021, September 24–28, 2018
Paper No: IPC2018-78569
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78569
View Paper titled, Limit States Design Checks for Geotechnical Loads
Open the PDF for Limit States Design Checks for Geotechnical Loads in another window
Topics: Design, Stress, Reliability, Safety, Buckling, Creep, Deformation, Landslides, Pipelines, Risk
Proceedings Papers

Next Generation Ductile Fracture Arrest Analyses for High Energy Pipelines Based on Detail Coupling of CFD and FEA Approach

K. K. Botros, E. J. Clavelle, M. Uddin, G. Wilkowski, C. Guan
Proc. ASME. IPC2018, Volume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and Joining, V003T05A002, September 24–28, 2018
Paper No: IPC2018-78097
https://doi.org/10.1115/IPC2018-78097
View Paper titled, Next Generation Ductile Fracture Arrest Analyses for High Energy Pipelines Based on Detail Coupling of CFD and FEA Approach
Open the PDF for Next Generation Ductile Fracture Arrest Analyses for High Energy Pipelines Based on Detail Coupling of CFD and FEA Approach in another window
Topics: Computational fluid dynamics, Ductile fracture, Finite element analysis, Pipelines, Fracture (Materials), Fracture toughness, Pipes, Geometry, Pressure, American Petroleum Institute