ASTM E1290 previously used the plastic hinge model for the calculation of CTOD, but has changed its CTOD calculation to J-based conversion since 2002. In this study, the ratio of ASTM-CTOD to BS-CTOD was analytically predicted and experimentally evaluated in linepipes. It was demonstrated that the CTOD ratio changed according to CTOD itself, and took a minimum in a CTOD ratio curve. The minimum value of the CTOD ratio was lower than 1 for low yield-to-tensile ratios, but higher than 1 for high yield-to-tensile ratios. The CTOD ratio tends to be higher than 1 for high CTOD caused by plastic instability, but around or less than 1 for low CTOD possibly caused by brittle fracture in X65 and X80. A CTOD transformation equation, which was proposed by the authors, can transform BS-CTOD into ASTM-CTOD with reasonable accuracy.
Skip Nav Destination
ASME 2009 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
May 31–June 5, 2009
Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
Conference Sponsors:
- Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering Division
ISBN:
978-0-7918-4346-8
PROCEEDINGS PAPER
A Comparison Between BS7448-CTOD and ASTM E1290-CTOD in Linepipes
Yoichi Kayamori,
Yoichi Kayamori
Nippon Steel Corporation, Futtsu, Chiba, Japan
Search for other works by this author on:
Takehiro Inoue,
Takehiro Inoue
Nippon Steel Corporation, Futtsu, Chiba, Japan
Search for other works by this author on:
Tetsuya Tagawa
Tetsuya Tagawa
Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
Search for other works by this author on:
Yoichi Kayamori
Nippon Steel Corporation, Futtsu, Chiba, Japan
Takehiro Inoue
Nippon Steel Corporation, Futtsu, Chiba, Japan
Tetsuya Tagawa
Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
Paper No:
OMAE2009-79526, pp. 101-106; 6 pages
Published Online:
February 16, 2010
Citation
Kayamori, Y, Inoue, T, & Tagawa, T. "A Comparison Between BS7448-CTOD and ASTM E1290-CTOD in Linepipes." Proceedings of the ASME 2009 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering. Volume 6: Materials Technology; C.C. Mei Symposium on Wave Mechanics and Hydrodynamics; Offshore Measurement and Data Interpretation. Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. May 31–June 5, 2009. pp. 101-106. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2009-79526
Download citation file:
6
Views
0
Citations
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Articles
Elliptical-Arc-Fillet Flexure Hinges: Toward a Generalized Model for Commonly Used Flexure Hinges
J. Mech. Des (August,2011)
Fracture Toughness of ASTM A533 Grade B Class 1 Heavy Section Submerged Arc Weldments
J. Basic Eng (June,1971)
Crack Arrest Toughness of a Heat-Affected Zone Containing Local
Brittle Zones
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng (November,1996)
Related Chapters
Background InformatIon
Guidebook for the Design of ASME Section VIII Pressure Vessels
Hydrostatic Testing and Brittle Fracture
A Quick Guide to API 653 Certified Storage Tank Inspector Syllabus: Example Questions and Worked Answers
Background Information
Guidebook for the Design of ASME Section VIII Pressure Vessels, Third Edition