Fluid-structure interaction in piping systems (FSI) consists of the transfer of momentum and forces between piping and the contained liquid during unsteady flow. Excitation mechanisms may be caused by rapid changes in flow and pressure or may be initiated by mechanical action of the piping. The interaction is manifested in pipe vibration and perturbations in velocity and pressure of the liquid. The resulting loads imparted on the piping are transferred to the support mechanisms such as hangers, thrust blocks, etc. The phenomenon has recently received increased attention because of safety and reliability concerns in power generation stations, environmental issues in pipeline delivery systems, and questions related to stringent industrial piping design performance guidelines. Furthermore, numerical advances have allowed practitioners to revisit the manner in which the interaction between piping and contained liquid is modeled, resulting in improved techniques that are now readily available to predict FSI. This review attempts to succinctly summarize the essential mechanisms that cause FSI, and present relevant data that describe the phenomenon. In addition, the various numerical and analytical methods that have been developed to successfully predict FSI will be described. Several earlier reviews regarding FSI in piping have been published; this review is intended to update the reader on developments that have taken place over the last approximately ten years, and to enhance the understanding of various aspects of FSI. There are 123 references cited in this review article.
Issue Section:
Review Articles
1.
Tijsseling
AS
(1996
), Fluid-structure interaction in liquid-filled pipe systems: a review
, J. Fluids Struct.
10
, 109
–146
.2.
Wiggert DC (1986), Coupled transient flow and structural motion in liquid-filled piping systems: a survey, Proc of ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conf, Chicago, Paper 86-PVP-4.
3.
Wiggert DC (1996), Fluid transients in flexible piping systems: a perspective on recent developments, Proc of 18th IAHR Symp on Hydraulic Machinery and Cavitation, Valencia, Spain, 58–67.
4.
Cowper
GR
(1966
), The shear coefficient in Timoshenko’s beam theory
, ASME J. Appl. Mech.
33
, 335
–340
.5.
Hilber
HM
, Hughes
TJR
, and Taylor
RL
(1977
), Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics
, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
5
, 283
–292
.1.
Wiggert
DC
, Otwell
RS
, and Hatfield
FJ
(1985
), The effect of elbow restraint on pressure transients
, ASME J. Fluids Eng.
107
, 402
–406
.2.
(Discussed by Schwirian RE and Walker JS in 108, 121–122.)
1.
Zhang
L
, Tijsseling
AS
, and Vardy
AE
(1999
), FSI analysis of liquid-filled pipes
, J. Sound Vib.
224
(1
), 69
–99
.2.
Tijsseling
AS
and Lavooij
CSW
(1990
), Waterhammer with fluid-structure interaction
, Appl. Sci. Res.
47
, 273
–285
.3.
Hara
F
(1988
), Seismic vibration analysis of fluid-structure interaction in LMFBR piping systems
, J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
110
, 177
–181
.4.
Diesselhorst
T
, Schmidt
R
, and Schnellhammer
W
(2000
), Realistic calculation of pressure surges. Inclusion of dynamic friction and fluid/structure interaction
, 3R International
39
, 678
–682
(in German).5.
Budny DD (1988), The influence of structural damping on the internal fluid pressure during a fluid transient pipe flow, PhD Thesis, Michigan State Univ, Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering, East Lansing MI.
6.
Kruisbrink ACH and Heinsbroek AGTJ (1992), Fluid-structure interaction in non-rigid pipeline systems—large scale validation tests, Proc of Int Conf on Pipeline Systems, BHR Group, Manchester, UK, 151–164.
7.
Kruisbrink ACH and Heinsbroek AGTJ (1992), Fluid-structure interaction in non-rigid pipeline systems—large scale validation tests, Proc of Second National Mechanics Congress, Kerkrade, The Netherlands, ISBN 0-7923-2442-0, 57–64.
8.
Enkel
P
and Grams
J
(1997
), Pressure surge analysis with regard to fluid structure interaction
, 3R International
36
, 446
–451
(in German).9.
Tijsseling AS and Fan D (1992), Fluid-structure interaction and column separation in a closed pipe, Proc of Second National Mechanics Congress, Kerkrade, The Netherlands, ISBN 0-7923-2442-0, 205–212.
10.
Lesmez MW (1989), Modal analysis of vibrations in liquid-filled piping systems, PhD Thesis, Michigan State Univ, Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering, East Lansing MI.
11.
Tenteralli SC (1990), Propagation of noise and vibration in complex hydraulic tubing systems, PhD Thesis, Lehigh Univ, Dept of Mechanical Engineering, Bethlehem PA.
12.
Brown
FT
and Tentarelli
SC
(2001
), Dynamic behavior of complex fluid-filled tubing systems—Part 1: Tubing analysis
, J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
123
, 71
–77
.13.
Tentarelli
SC
and Brown
FT
(2001
), Dynamic behavior of complex fluid-filled tubing systems—Part 2: System analysis
, J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
123
, 78
–84
.14.
Frikha S (1992), Analyse expe´rimentale des sollicitations dynamiques applique´es a` une portion de structure en service mode´lisable par la the´orie des poutres, PhD Thesis, Ecole Nationale Supe´rieure des Arts et Me´tiers (ENSAM), Lab de Me´canique des Structures, Paris, France (in French).
15.
De Jong CAF (1994, 2000), Analysis of pulsations and vibrations in fluid-filled pipe systems, PhD Thesis, Eindhoven Univ of Technology, Dept of Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven, The Netherlands (Errata: April 2000).
16.
Svingen B (1996), Fluid structure interaction in piping systems, PhD Thesis, The Norwegian Univ of Science and Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Trondheim, Norway.
17.
Svingen B (1996), Fluid structure interaction in slender pipes, Proc of 7th Int Conf on Pressure Surges and Fluid Transients in Pipelines and Open Channels, BHR Group, Harrogate, UK, 385–396.
18.
Wiggert
DC
, Hatfield
FJ
, and Stuckenbruck
S
(1987
), Analysis of liquid and structural transients by the method of characteristics
, ASME J. Fluids Eng.
109
, 161
–165
.19.
Heinsbroek AGTJ and Kruisbrink ACH (1993), Fluid-structure interaction in non-rigid pipeline systems—large scale validation experiments, Transactions of SMiRT12, Stuttgart, Germany, Paper J08/1.
20.
Heinsbroek AGTJ and Kruisbrink ACH (1991), FLUSTRIN Phase 3 Validation Experiments and Simulations, Research Report J 526, Delft Hydraulics, Delft, The Netherlands.
21.
Heinsbroek AGTJ and Tijsseling AS (1993), Fluid-structure interaction in non-rigid pipeline systems—a numerical investigation II, Transactions of SMiRT12, Stuttgart, Germany, Paper J08/2.
22.
Heinsbroek
AGTJ
(1997
), Fluid-structure interaction in non-rigid pipeline systems
, Nucl. Eng. Des.
172
, 123
–135
.23.
Kojima
E
and Shinada
M
(1988
), Dynamic behavior of a finite length straight pipe subject to water-hammer (2nd report, for a very thin-walled pipe
), Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., Ser. B
54
, 3346
–3353
(in Japanese).24.
Mitchell AR and Griffiths DF (1980), The Finite Difference Method in Partial Differential Equations, John Wiley and Sons.
25.
Elansary
AS
, Silva
W
, and Chaudhry
MH
(1994
), Numerical and experimental investigation of transient pipe flow
, J. Hydraul. Res.
32
, 689
–706
.26.
Vardy
AE
, Fan
D
, and Tijsseling
AS
(1996
), Fluid/structure interaction in a T-piece pipe
, J. Fluids Struct.
10
, 763
–786
.27.
Lesmez
MW
, Wiggert
DC
, and Hatfield
FJ
(1990
), Modal analysis of vibrations in liquid-filled piping-systems
, ASME J. Fluids Eng.
112
, 311
–318
.28.
Jezequel L, Khamlichi A, and Tephany F (1994), Interpretation of fluid-structure interaction experiment in a frame pipe, Sloshing, Fluid-Structure Interaction and Structural Response due to Shock and Impact Loads, ASME-PVP 272 1–12.
29.
De Jong, CAF (1995), Analysis of pulsations and vibrations in fluid-filled pipe systems, Proc of 1995 Design Engineering Tech. Conf, Boston, ASME-DE 84-2, Vol 3, Part B, 829–834.
30.
Vardy AE and Fan D (1989), Flexural waves in a closed tube, Proc of 6th Int Conf on Pressure Surges, BHRA, Cambridge, UK, 43–57.
31.
Jiao
Z
, Hua
Q
, and Yu
K
(1999
), Frequency domain analysis of vibrations in liquid-filled piping systems
, Acta Aeronaut. Astronaut. Sinica
20
(4
), 1
–18
(in Chinese).32.
Erath
W
, Nowotny
B
, and Maetz
J
(1998
), Simultaneous coupling of the calculation of pressure waves and pipe oscillations
, 3R International
37
, 501
–508
(in German).33.
Erath
W
, Nowotny
B
, and Maetz
J
(1999
), Modelling the fluid structure interaction produced by a waterhammer during shutdown of high-pressure pumps
, Nucl. Eng. Des.
193
, 283
–296
.34.
Lavooij
CSW
and Tijsseling
AS
(1991
), Fluid-structure interaction in liquid-filled piping systems
, J. Fluids Struct.
5
, 573
–595
.35.
Heinsbroek AGTJ, Lavooij CSW, and Tijsseling AS (1991), Fluid-structure interaction in non-rigid piping—a numerical investigation, Transactions of SMiRT 11, Tokyo, Japan, Paper B12/1, 309–314.
36.
Heinsbroek AGTJ (1993), Fluid-structure interaction in non-rigid pipeline systems—comparative analyses, ASME/TWI 12th Int Conf on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Glasgow, UK, Paper OMAE-93-1018, 405–410.
37.
Heinsbroek AGTJ and Tijsseling AS (1994), The influence of support rigidity on waterhammer pressures and pipe stresses, Proc of 2nd Int Conf on Water Pipeline Systems, BHR Group, Edinburgh, UK, 17–30.
38.
Tijsseling AS and Heinsbroek AGTJ (1999), The influence of bend motion on waterhammer pressures and pipe stresses, Proc of 3rd ASME & JSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conf, Symp S-290 Waterhammer, JCP Liou (ed), San Francisco, ASME-FED 248 1–7.
39.
Tijsseling AS (1997), Poisson-coupling beat in extended waterhammer theory, Proc of 4th Int Symp on Fluid-Structure Interactions, Aeroelasticity, Flow-Induced Vibration and Noise, Dallas, ASME-AD 53-2, 529–532.
40.
Bouabdallah S and Massouh F (1997), Fluid-structure interaction in hydraulic networks, Proc of 4th Int Symp on Fluid-Structure Interactions, Aeroelasticity, Flow-Induced Vibration and Noise, Dallas, ASME-AD 53-2, 543–548.
41.
Gorman
DG
, Reese
JM
, and Zhang
YL
(2000
), Vibration of a flexible pipe conveying viscous pulsating fluid flow
, J. Sound Vib.
230
(2
), 379
–392
.42.
Lee
U
, Pak
CH
, and Hong
SC
(1995
), The dynamics of a piping system with internal unsteady flow
, J. Sound Vib.
180
(2
), 297
–311
.43.
Charley J and Caignaert G (1993), Vibroacoustical analysis of flow in pipes by transfer matrix with fluid-structure interaction, Proc of 6th Int Meeting of the IAHR Work Group on the Behavior of Hydraulic Machinery under Steady Oscillatory Conditions, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1–9.
44.
Zhang
L
, Tijsseling
AS
, and Vardy
AE
(1995
), Frequency response analysis in internal flows
, J. Hydrodynam. China Ocean Press, Beijing, Series B
3
(3
), 39
–49
.45.
Svingen B (1994), A frequency domain solution of the coupled hydromechanical vibrations in piping systems by the finite element method, Proc of 17th IAHR Symp on Hydraulic Machinery and Cavitation, Beijing, PR China, 1259–1269.
46.
Gajic´ A, Pejovic´ S, Stojanovic´ Z, and Kratic´a J (1995), Fluid-structure interaction analysis in frequency domain, Proc of 7th Int Meeting of the IAHR Work Group on the Behavior of Hydraulic Machinery under Steady Oscillatory Conditions, Ljubljana, Slovenia, Paper F5.
47.
Gajic´ A, Pejovic´ S, and Stojanovic´ Z (1996), Hydraulic oscillation analysis using the fluid-structure interaction model, Proc of 18th IAHR Symp on Hydraulic Machinery and Cavitation, Valencia, Spain, 845–854.
48.
Svingen B and Kjeldsen M (1995), Fluid structure interaction in piping systems, Proc of Int Conf on Finite Elements in Fluids—New Trends and Applications, Venice, Italy, 955–963.
49.
Svingen B (1997), Rayleigh damping as an approximate model for transient hydraulic pipe friction, Proc of 8th Int Meeting of the IAHR Work Group on the Behavior of Hydraulic Machinery under Steady Oscillatory Conditions, Chatou, France, Paper F2.
50.
Svingen B, Stojanovic´ Z, Brekke H, and Gajic´ A (1997), Two numerical methods of hydraulic oscillations analysis in piping systems including fluid-structure interaction, Proc of Int Conf on Fluid Engineering, JSME Centennial Grand Congress, Tokyo, Japan, 1601–1606.
51.
Moussou P, Vaugrante P, Guivarch M, and Seligmann D (2000), Coupling effects in a two elbows piping system, Proc of 7th Int Conf on Flow Induced Vibrations, Lucerne, Switzerland, 579-586.
52.
Bu¨rmann
W
and Thielen
H
(1988
), Measurement and computation of dynamic reactive forces on pipes containing flow
, 3R International
27
, 434
–440
(in German).53.
Tijsseling AS and Vardy AE (1996), Axial modelling and testing of a pipe rack, Proc of 7th Int Conf on Pressure Surges and Fluid Transients in Pipelines and Open Channels, BHR Group, Harrogate, UK, 363–383.
54.
Raschke
E
, Seelinger
P
, Sperber
A
, and Strassburger
R
(1994
), Simulation des instationa¨ren Verhaltens verfahrenstechnischer Anlagen mit langen Rohrleitungen
, Chem.-Ing.-Tech.
66
, 652
–660
(in German).55.
Hamilton M and Taylor G (1996), Pressure surge–Case studies, Proc of 7th Int Conf on Pressure Surges and Fluid Transients in Pipelines and Open Channels, BHR Group, Harrogate, UK, 15–27.
56.
Locher FA, Huntamer JB, and O’Sullivan JD (2000), Caution—Pressure surges in process and industrial systems may be fatal, Proc of 8th Int Conf on Pressure Surges, BHR Group, The Hague, The Netherlands, 3–18.
57.
Hamilton M and Taylor G (1996), Pressure surge–Criteria for acceptability, Proc of 7th Int Conf on Pressure Surges and Fluid Transients in Pipelines and Open Channels, BHR Group, Harrogate, UK, 343-362.
58.
Chary SR, Kumar GV, Rajamani A, and Rao CVK (1998), Transient response of a boiler feed pump discharge pipeline–A case study, Proc of 16th Int Modal Analysis Conf, Santa Barbara CA, 1–10.
59.
Kwong
AHM
and Edge
KA
(1996
), Structure-borne noise prediction in liquid-conveying pipe systems
, Proc of Institution of Mech Eng Part I—J. Syst. Control Eng.
210
(3
), 189
–200
.60.
Kwong
AHM
and Edge
KA
(1998
), A method to reduce noise in hydraulic systems by optimizing pipe clamp locations
, Proc of Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part I—J. Syst. Control Eng.
212
(14
), 267
–280
.61.
De Jong CAF and Janssens MHA (1996), Numerical studies of inverse methods for quantification of sound transmission along fluid-filled pipes, Proc of Internoise 96, Liverpool, UK, 3203–3206.
62.
Janssens
MHA
and Verheij
JW
(1999
), The use of an equivalent forces method for the experimental quantification of structural sound transmission in ships
, J. Sound Vib.
226
(2
), 305
–328
.63.
Tijsseling AS and Vardy AE (1996), On the suppression of coupled liquid/pipe vibrations, Proc of 18th IAHR Symp on Hydraulic Machinery and Cavitation, Valencia, Spain, 945–954.
64.
Munjal
ML
and Thawani
PT
(1997
), Prediction of the vibro-acoustic transmission loss of planar hose-pipe systems
, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
101
, 2524
–2535
.65.
Koo
GH
and Park
YS
(1998
), Vibration reduction by using periodic supports in a piping system
, J. Sound Vib.
210
(1
), 53
–68
.66.
Hatfield
FJ
and Wiggert
DC
(1990
), Seismic pressure surges in liquid-filled pipelines
, J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
112
, 279
–283
.67.
Bettinali F, Molinaro P, Ciccotelli M, and Micelotta A (1991), Transient analysis in piping networks including fluid-structure interaction and cavitation effects, Transactions SMiRT 11, Tokyo, Paper K35/5, 565–570.
68.
Ogawa
N
, Mikoshiba
T
, and Minowa
C
(1994
), Hydraulic effects on a large piping system during strong earthquakes
, J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
116
, 161
–168
.69.
Rutten MCM (1998), Fluid-solid interaction in large arteries, PhD Thesis, Eindhoven Univ of Technology, Dept of Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
70.
Rachid FBF and Stuckenbruck S (1989), Transients in liquid and structure in viscoelastic pipes, Proc of 6th Int Conf on Pressure Surges, BHRA, Cambridge, UK, 69–84.
71.
Rachid FBF, Costa Mattos H, and Stuckenbruck S (1991), Fluid-structure interaction in elasto-viscoplastic piping systems, Proc of first ASME & JSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conf, Portland, ASME-FED 107 65–73.
72.
Rachid
FBF
and Costa Mattos
HS
(1994
), Model for structural failure of elasto-viscoplastic pipelines
, Meccanica
29
, 293
–304
.73.
Rachid FBF, Costa Mattos H, and Stuckenbruck S (1992), Waterhammer in inelastic pipes: an approach via an internal variable constitutive theory, Proc of Int Conf on Unsteady Flow and Fluid Transients, Durham, UK, ISBN 90-5410-046-X, 63–70.
74.
Rachid
FBF
, Gama
RMS
, and Costa Mattos
H
(1994
), Modelling of hydraulic transients in damageable elasto-viscoplastic piping systems
, Appl. Math. Model.
18
, 207
–215
.75.
Rachid FBF and Costa Mattos HS (1995), Pressure transients in damageable elasto-plastic pipes, Proc of Joint ASME/JSME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conf, Honolulu, ASME-PVP 301 31–40.
76.
Rachid
FBF
and Costa Mattos
HS
(1998
), Modelling of pipeline integrity taking into account the fluid-structure interaction
, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
28
, 337
–355
.77.
Rachid
FBF
and Costa Mattos
HS
(1999
), On the suitability of the low Mach number assumption in the modeling of the damage induced by pressure transients in piping systems
, ASME J. Fluids Eng.
121
, 112
–117
.78.
Yu
JH
and Kojima
E
(1998
), Wave propagation in fluids contained in finite-length anisotropic viscoelastic pipes
, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.
104
, 3227
–3235
.79.
Suo
L
and Wylie
EB
(1990
), Complex wavespeed and hydraulic transients in viscoelastic pipes
, ASME J. Fluids Eng.
112
, 496
–500
.80.
Paı¨doussis MP (1998), Fluid-Structure Interactions (Slender Structures and Axial Flow), Vol 1, Academic Press.
81.
Zhuge Q, Cai Y, and Yang S (1987), Modal synthesis technique for vibration of complex piping systems, Proc of first Int Conf on Flow Induced Vibrations, BHRA, Bowness-on-Windermere, UK, 513–520.
82.
Stittgen M and Zielke W (1989), Fluid-structure interaction in flexible curved pipes, Proc of 6th Int Conf on Pressure Surges, BHRA, Cambridge, UK, 101–120.
83.
Piet-Lahanier
N
and Ohayon
R
(1990
), Finite element analysis of a slender fluid-structure system
, J. Fluids Struct.
4
, 631
–645
.84.
Dodds HL and Runyan HL (1965), Effect of high velocity fluid flow on the bending vibrations and static divergence of a simply supported pipe, NASA Technical Note D-2870.
85.
Davidson
LC
and Smith
JE
(1969
), Liquid-structure coupling in curved pipes
, Shock Vib. Bull.
40, Part 4
, 197
–207
.86.
Everstine GC (1984), Dynamic analysis of fluid-filled piping systems using finite element techniques, Advances in Fluid-Structure Interaction, ASME-PVP 78, ASME-AMD 64 125–139.
87.
Brown FT and Tentarelli SC (1988), Analysis of noise and vibration in complex tubing systems with fluid-wall interactions, Proc of 43rd National Conf on Fluid Power, Chicago, 139–149.
88.
Lee U, Pak CH, and Hong SC (1993), Dynamics of piping system with internal unsteady flow, Fluid-Structure Interaction, Transient Thermal-Hydraulics, and Structural Mechanics, ASME-PVP Vol 253 103–110.
89.
Paı¨doussis
MP
and Issid
NT
(1974
), Dynamic stability of pipes conveying fluid
, J. Sound Vib.
33
(3
), 267
–294
.90.
Lee
U
and Kim
J
(1999
), Dynamics of branched pipeline systems conveying internal unsteady flow
, J. Vibr. Acoust.
121
, 114
–122
.91.
Wang
Z-M
and Tan
SK
(1997
), Coupled analysis of fluid transients and structural dynamic responses of a pipeline system
, J. Hydraul. Res.
35
, 119
–131
.92.
Wang
Z-M
and Tan
SK
(1998
), Vibration and pressure fluctuation in a flexible hydraulic power system on an aircraft
, Comput. Fluids
27
, 1
–9
.93.
Clough RW and Penzien J (1975), Dynamics of Structures, McGraw-Hill.
94.
Weaver W, Timoshenko SP, and Young DH (1990), Vibration Problems in Engineering (5th edition), John Wiley and Sons.
95.
Vardy
AE
and Alsarraj
AT
(1991
), Coupled axial and flexural vibration of 1-D members
, J. Sound Vib.
148
(1
), 25
–39
.96.
Fan D (1989), Fluid-structure interactions in internal flows, PhD Thesis, Univ of Dundee, Dept of Civil Engineering, Dundee, UK.
97.
Valentin RA, Phillips JW, and Walker JS (1979), Reflection and transmission of fluid transients at an elbow, Transactions of SMiRT5, Berlin, Germany, Paper B 2/6.
98.
Hsu
CK
and Phillips
JW
(1981
), Pulse propagation in fluid-filled elastic curved tubes
, J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
103
, 43
–49
.99.
Chen
SS
(1972
), Flow-induced in-plane instabilities of curved pipes
, Nucl. Eng. Des.
23
, 29
–38
.100.
Chen
SS
(1973
), Out-of-plane vibration and stability of curved tubes conveying fluid
, ASME J. Appl. Mech.
40
, 362
–368
.101.
Dupuis
C
and Rousselet
J
(1992
), The equations of motion of curved pipes conveying fluid
, J. Sound Vib.
153
(3
), 473
–489
.102.
Dodge
WG
and Moore
SE
(1972
), Stress indices and flexibility factors for moment loadings on elbows and curved pipe
, Weld. Res. Counc. Bull.
179
, 1
–16
.103.
Leslie DJ and Tijsseling AS (1999), A review of modelling damping mechanisms in coupled liquid-pipe vibrations, Proc of 3rd ASME & JSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conf, Symp S-290 Waterhammer, JCP Liou (ed), San Francisco, ASME-FED 248 1–8.
104.
Budny
DD
, Hatfield
FJ
, and Wiggert
DC
(1990
), An experimental study on the influence of structural damping on internal fluid pressure during a transient flow
, J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
112
, 284
–290
.105.
Budny
DD
, Wiggert
DC
, and Hatfield
FJ
(1991
), The influence of structural damping on internal pressure during a transient flow
, ASME J. Fluids Eng.
113
, 424
–429
.106.
Leslie DJ and Tijsseling AS (1999), Wave speeds and phase velocities in liquid-filled pipes, Proc of 9th Int Meeting of the IAHR Work Group on the Behavior of Hydraulic Machinery under Steady Oscillatory Conditions, Brno, Czech Republic, Paper E1.
107.
Kruisbrink ACH (1990), Modelling of safety and relief valves in waterhammer computer codes, Proc of 3rd Int Conf on Developments in Valves and Actuators for Fluid Control, BHRA, Bournemouth, UK, 137–149.
108.
Wylie
EB
(1984
), Simulation of vaporous and gaseous cavitation
, ASME J. Fluids Eng.
106
, 307
–311
.109.
Zielke
W
and Perko
H-D
(1985
), Low pressure phenomena and waterhammer analysis
, 3R International
24
, 348
–355
(in German).110.
Fan
D
and Tijsseling
AS
(1992
), Fluid-structure interaction with cavitation in transient pipe flows
, ASME J. Fluids Eng.
114
, 268
–274
.111.
Tijsseling
AS
, Vardy
AE
, and Fan
D
(1996
), Fluid-structure interaction and cavitation in a single-elbow pipe system
, J. Fluids Struct.
10
, 395
–420
.112.
Hatfield
FJ
and Wiggert
DC
(1991
), Waterhammer response of flexible piping by component synthesis
, J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
113
, 115
–119
.113.
Mansour SGS (1998), Waterhammer and fluid-structure interaction modelling, PhD Thesis, Technical Univ Braunschweig, Dept of Civil Engineering, Leichtweiss Institute for Hydraulic Engineering, Braunschweig, Germany.
114.
Mansour SGS (1998), The application of Verwey-Yu scheme in FSI simulations, Proc of 3rd Int Conf on Hydroinformatics, Copenhagen, Denmark.
115.
Abbott MB and Basco DR (1989), Computational Fluid Dynamics: An Introduction for Engineers, Longman.
116.
Greenshields
CJ
, Weller
HG
, and Ivankovic
A
(1999
), The finite volume method for coupled fluid flow and stress analysis
, Comput Model Simulation Eng
4
, 213
–218
.117.
Bahrar
B
, Rieutord
E
, Morel
R
, and Zeggwagh
G
(1998
), Modeling of the waterhammer phenomenon with respect to real pipe behavior
, La Houille Blanche-Revue Int de l’Eau
53
, 18
–25
(in French). Copyright © 2001
by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.
