The Influence of Variable Gas Properties on Turbomachinery Computational Fluid Dynamics

[+] Author and Article Information
John D. Northall

 Rolls-Royce plc, P.O. Box 3, Moor Lane, Derby DE24 8BJ, UKjohn.northall@rolls-royce.com

J. Turbomach 128(4), 632-638 (Feb 01, 2005) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2221324 History: Received October 01, 2004; Revised February 01, 2005

This paper describes the inclusion of variable gas properties within a Reynolds average Navier-Stokes solver for turbomachinery and its application to multistage turbines. Most current turbomachinery computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models the gas as perfect with constant specific heats. However, the specific heat at constant pressure CP can vary significantly. This is most marked in the turbine where large variations of temperature are combined with variations in the fuel air ratio. In the current model CP is computed as a function of the local temperature and fuel air ratio using polynomial curve fits to represent the real gas behavior. The importance of variable gas properties is assessed by analyzing a multistage turbine typical of the core stages of a modern aeroengine. This calculation includes large temperature variations due to radial profiles at inlet, the addition of cooling air, and work extraction through the machine. The calculation also includes local variations in fuel air ratio resulting from the inlet profile and the dilution of the mixture by the addition of coolant air. A range of gas models is evaluated. The addition of variable gas properties is shown to have no significant effect on the convergence of the algorithm, and the extra computational costs are modest. The models are compared with emphasis on the parameters of importance in turbine design, such as capacity, work, and efficiency. Overall the effect on turbine performance prediction of including variable gas properties in three-dimensional CFD is found to be small.

Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Mass average total temperature versus axial distance for models 1 and 4

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

CP axial variation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

IP rotor leading edge on outer annulus wall

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

HP/IP turbine secondary air flows

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Mass average exit whirl angle (deg) versus span

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Inlet CP versus span

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Mass average exit total pressure loss coefficient versus span

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Variation of CP with temperature and fuel air ratio



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In