Research Papers

Effects of Regular and Random Roughness on the Heat Transfer and Skin Friction Coefficient on the Suction Side of a Gas Turbine Vane

[+] Author and Article Information
Jason E. Dees, David G. Bogard

 The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712

J. Turbomach 130(4), 041012 (Aug 01, 2008) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2812338 History: Received June 07, 2007; Revised August 15, 2007; Published August 01, 2008

Skin friction coefficients and heat transfer coefficients are measured for a range of regular and random roughnesses on the suction side of a simulated gas turbine vane. The skin friction coefficients are calculated using boundary layer data and the momentum integral method. High resolution surface temperature data measured with an IR camera yield local heat transfer values. 80 grit, 50 grit, 36 grit, and 20 grit sandpapers along with a regular array of conical roughness elements are tested. Measured skin friction coefficient data show that the conical roughness array behaves very similar to the 50 grit, 36 grit, and 20 grit sandpapers in terms of the effect of the roughness on the hydrodynamic boundary layer. In terms of heat transfer, the conical roughness array is most similar to the 80 grit sandpaper, which are both lower than the roughest sandpapers tested. These data show that the particular regular array of roughness elements tested has fundamentally different behavior than randomly rough surfaces for this position on the simulated turbine vane. In addition, this difference is in the opposite direction as seen in previous experimental studies. In order to draw a more general conclusion about the nature of random and regular roughness, a parametric study of regular roughness arrays should be performed.

Copyright © 2008 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Laterally averaged heat transfer coefficient for various surface roughness levels

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Stanton number augmentation for various surface roughness levels

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Combined St∕(Cf∕2) value for various surface roughness levels

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

St∕(Cf∕2) versus roughness level

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Schematic of the simulated turbine vane test section

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Schematic of test vane detail

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Cp distribution for the vane (from Ref. 9)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Schematic of regular roughness array

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Mean velocity profiles at s∕C=0.37 for varying surface roughnesses

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Mean velocity profiles at s∕C=0.57 for varying surface roughnesses

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Fluctuating velocity profiles, s∕C=0.37

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Fluctuating velocity profiles, s∕C=0.57

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Skin friction coefficient values for various roughness levels

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Skin friction augmentation factors for various surface roughness levels



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In