Research Papers

Time-Linearized and Time-Accurate 3D RANS Methods for Aeroelastic Analysis in Turbomachinery

[+] Author and Article Information
Hans-Peter Kersken1

Christian Frey, Christian Voigt

Graham Ashcroft

 Institute of Propulsion Technology,  German Aerospace Center (DLR),  Linder Höhe, 51147 Cologne, GermanyGraham.Ashcroft@dlr.de


Address all correspondence to this author.

J. Turbomach 134(5), 051024 (May 24, 2012) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4004749 History: Received April 08, 2011; Revised July 08, 2011; Published May 24, 2012; Online May 24, 2012

A computational method for performing aeroelastic analysis using either a time-linearized or an unsteady time-accurate solver for the compressible Reynolds averaged Navier--Stokes (RANS) equations is described. The time-linearized solver employs the assumption of small time-harmonic perturbations and is implemented via finite differences of the nonlinear flux routines of the time-accurate solver. The resulting linear system is solved using a parallelized generalized minimal residual (GMRES) method with block-local preconditioning. The time accurate solver uses a dual time stepping algorithm for the solution of the unsteady RANS equations on a periodically moving computational grid. For either solver, and both flutter and forced response problems, a mapping algorithm has been developed to map structural eigenmodes, obtained from finite element structural analysis, from the surface mesh of the finite element structural solver to the surface mesh of the finite volume flow solver. Using the surface displacement data an elliptic mesh deformation algorithm, based on linear elasticity theory, is then used to compute the grid deformation vector field. The developed methods are validated first using standard configuration 10. Finally, for an ultra-high bypass ratio fan, the results of the time-linearized and the unsteady module are compared. The gain in prediction time using the linearized methods is highlighted.

Copyright © 2012 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Welded turbine vane cluster: FE data (right) and CFD mesh with mapped displacements (left)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Comparison of surface displacements mapped from the FE mesh (right) to the CFD mesh (left)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Original (yellow) and deformed tip clearence cells at 0 deg (blue) and 180 deg (green)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Amplitude (top) and phase (bottom) of the pressure perturbation versus chordwise coordinate normalized by the chordlength for STCF10 case 8

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Aerodynamic damping for STCF10

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

UHBR fan rig mounted in DLR’s M2VP test facility

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Aerodynamic damping for UHBR

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Real part of the aerodynamic work computed with the nonlinear method (top) and the linear method (bottom)



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In