Research Papers

Predicting High-Lift Low-Pressure Turbine Cascades Flow Using Transition-Sensitive Turbulence Closures

[+] Author and Article Information
Roberto Pacciani

e-mail: roberto.pacciani@unifi.it

Andrea Arnone

Department of Industrial Engineering
University of Florence
via di Santa Marta,
3 Firenze 50139,Italy

Francesco Bertini

Avio S.p.A. via I Maggio, 99,
Rivalta di Torino (TO) 10040,Italy

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received June 13, 2013; final manuscript received July 29, 2013; published online September 27, 2013. Editor: Ronald Bunker.

J. Turbomach 136(5), 051007 (Sep 27, 2013) (11 pages) Paper No: TURBO-13-1098; doi: 10.1115/1.4025224 History: Received June 13, 2013; Revised July 29, 2013

This paper discusses the application of different transition-sensitive turbulence closures to the prediction of low-Reynolds-number flows in high-lift cascades operating in low-pressure turbine (LPT) conditions. Different formulations of the well known γ-R˜eθt model are considered and compared to a recently developed transition model based on the laminar kinetic energy (LKE) concept. All those approaches have been coupled to the Wilcox k-ω turbulence model. The performance of the transition-sensitive closures has been assessed by analyzing three different high-lift cascades, recently tested experimentally in two European research projects (Unsteady Transition in Axial Turbomachines (UTAT) and Turbulence and Transition Modeling for Special Turbomachinery Applications (TATMo)). Such cascades (T106A, T106C, and T108) feature different loading distributions, different suction side diffusion factors, and they are characterized by suction side boundary layer separation when operated in steady inflow. Both steady and unsteady inflow conditions (induced by upstream passing wakes) have been studied. Particular attention has been devoted to the treatment of crucial boundary conditions like the freestream turbulence intensity and the turbulent length scale. A detailed comparison between measurements and computations, in terms of blade surface isentropic Mach number distributions and cascade lapse rates will be presented and discussed. Specific features of the computed wake-induced transition patterns will be discussed for selected Reynolds numbers. Finally, some guidelines concerning the computations of high-lift cascades for LPT applications using Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS)/unsteady RANS (URANS) approaches and transition-sensitive closures will be reported.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Cobley, K., Coleman, N., Siden, G., and Arndt, N., 1997, “Design of New Three Stage Low Pressure Turbine for the BMW Rolls-Royce BR715 Turbofan Engine,” ASME Paper No. 97–GT–419.
Curtis, E. M., Hodson, H. P., Banieghbal, M. R., Denton, J. D., Howell, R. J., and Harvey, N. W., 1997, “Development of Blade Profiles for Low Pressure Turbine Applications,” ASME J. Turbomach., 119(3), pp. 531–538. [CrossRef]
Haselbach, F., Schiffer, H. P., Horsman, M., Dressen, S., Harvey, N. W., and Read, S., 2002, “The Application of Ultra High Lift Blading in the BR715 LP Turbine,” ASME J. Turbomach., 124(1), pp. 45–51. [CrossRef]
Howell, R. J., Hodson, H. P., Schulte, V., Stieger, R. D., Schiffer, H. P., Haselbach, F., and Harvey, N. W., 2002, “Boundary Layer Development in the BR710 and BR715 LP Turbines—The Implementation of High–Lift and Ultra–High–Lift Concepts,” ASME J. Turbomach., 124(3), pp. 385–392. [CrossRef]
Schulte, V., and Hodson, H. P., 1998, “Unsteady Wake–Induced Boundary Layer Transition in High Lift LP Turbines,” ASME J. Turbomach., 120(1), pp. 28–35. [CrossRef]
Stieger, R. D., and Hodson, H. P., 2004, “The Transition Mechanism of Highly Loaded Low-Pressure Turbine Blades,” ASME J. Turbomach., 126(4), pp. 536–543. [CrossRef]
Banieghbal, M. R., Curtis, E. M., Denton, J. D., Hodson, H. P., Huntsman, I., Schulte, V., Harvey, N. W., and Steele, A. B., 1995, “Wake Passing in LP Turbine Blades,” AGARD Conference, Derby, UK, May 8–12.
Uzol, O., Zhang, X. F., Cranstone, A., and Hodson, H. P., 2007, “Investigation of Unsteady Wake-Separated Boundary Layer Interaction Using Particle-Image-Velocimetry,” ASME Paper No. GT2007-28099. [CrossRef]
Satta, F., Simoni, D., Ubaldi, M., Zunino, P., and Bertini, F., 2010, “Experimental Investigation of Separation and Transition Processes on a High-Lift Low-Pressure Turbine Profile Under Steady and Unsteady Inflow at Low Reynolds Number,” J. Therm. Sci., 19(1), pp. 26–33. [CrossRef]
Coull, J. D., Thomas, R. L., and Hodson, H. P., 2010, “Velocity Distributions for Low Pressure Turbines,” ASME J. Turbomach., 132(4), p. 041006. [CrossRef]
Suzen, Y. B., Huang, P. G., Ashpis, D. E., Volino, R. J., Corke, T. C., Thomas, F. O., Huang, J., Lake, J. P., and King, P. I., 2007, “A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of Transitional Flows in Low-Pressure Turbines Under a Wide Range of Operating Conditions,” ASME J. Turbomach., 129(3), pp. 527–541. [CrossRef]
Menter, F. R., Langtry, R. B., Likki, S. R., Suzen, Y. B., Huang, P. G., and Völker, S., 2006, “A Correlation-Based Transition Model Using Local Variables—Part I: Model Formulation,” ASME J. Turbomach., 128(3), pp. 413–422. [CrossRef]
Langtry, R. B., and Menter, F. R., 2009, “Correlation-Based Transition Modeling for Unstructured Parallelized Computational Fluid Dynamics Codes,” AIAA J., 47(12), pp. 2894–2906. [CrossRef]
Content, C., and Houdeville, R., 2010, “Local Correlation-Based Transition Model,” 8th International ERCOFTAC Symposium on Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Measurements, Marseille, France, June 9–11, pp. 522–527.
Suluksna, K., Dechaumphai, P., and Juntasaro, E., 2009, “Correlations for Modeling Transitional Boundary Layers Under Influences of Freestream Turbulence and Pressure Gradient,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 30, pp. 66–75. [CrossRef]
Babajee, J., and Arts, T., 2012, “Investigation of the Laminar Separation-Induced Transition With the γ-R˜eθt Transition Model on Low-Pressure Turbine Rotor Blades at Steady Conditions,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-68687. [CrossRef]
Walters, D. K., and Leylek, J. H., 2004, “A New Model for Boundary Layer Transition Using a Single-Point RANS Approach,” ASME J. Turbomach., 126(1), pp. 193–202. [CrossRef]
Walters, D. K., and Leylek, J. H., 2005, “Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of Wake-Induced Transition on a Compressor-Like Flat Plate,” ASME J. Turbomach., 127(1), pp. 52–63. [CrossRef]
Lardeau, S., Leschziner, M. A., and Li, N., 2004, “Modelling Bypass Transition With Low-Reynolds-Number Nonlinear Eddy-Viscosity Closure,” Flow Turbul. Combust., 73, pp. 49–76. [CrossRef]
Mayle, R. E., and Schultz, A., 1997, “The Path to Predicting Bypass Transition,” ASME J. Turbomach., 119(3), pp. 405–411. [CrossRef]
Lardeau, S., and Leschziner, M. A., 2006, “Modelling of Wake-Induced Transition in Low-Pressure Turbine Cascades,” AIAA J., 44(8), pp. 1854–1865. [CrossRef]
Pacciani, R., Marconcini, M., Fadai-Ghotbi, A., Lardeau, S., and Leschziner, M. A., 2011, “Calculation of High-Lift Cascades in Low Pressure Turbine Conditions Using a Three-Equation Model,” ASME J. Turbomach., 133(3), p. 031016. [CrossRef]
Pacciani, R., Marconcini, M., Arnone, A., and Bertini, F., 2012, “URANS Analysis of Wake-Induced Effects in High-Lift, Low Reynolds Number Cascade Flows,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-69479. [CrossRef]
Arnone, A., Liou, M. S., and Povinelli, L. A., 1992, “Navier–Stokes Solution of Transonic Cascade Flow Using Non–Periodic C–Type Grids,” J. Propul. Power, 8(2), pp. 410–417. [CrossRef]
Arnone, A., and Pacciani, R., 1996, “Rotor-Stator Interaction Analysis Using the Navier–Stokes Equations and a Multigrid Method,” ASME J. Turbomach., 118(4), pp. 679–689. [CrossRef]
Jameson, A., 1991, “Time Dependent Calculations Using Multigrid With Applications to Unsteady Flows Past Airfoils and Wings,” AIAA Paper No. 91-1596. [CrossRef]
Rumsey, C. L., Thacker, W. D., Gatsky, T. B., and Grosch, C. E., 2005, “Analysis of Transition-Sensitized Turbulent Equation,” AIAA Paper No. 2005-0523. [CrossRef]
Wilcox, D. C., 1998, Turbulence Modeling for CFD, 2 edition, DCW Ind. Inc., La Canada, CA.
Lardeau, S., Li, N., and Leschziner, M. A., 2007, “Large Eddy Simulations of Transitional Boundary Layers at High Free-Stream Turbulence Intensity and Implications for RANS Modeling,” ASME J. Turbomach., 129(2), pp. 311–317. [CrossRef]
Wissink, J. G., and Rodi, W., 2006, “Direct Numerical Simulations of Transitional Flow in Turbomachinery,” ASME J. Turbomach., 128(4), pp. 668–678. [CrossRef]
Hatman, A., and Wang, T., 1999, “A Prediction Model for Separated-Flow Transition,” ASME J. Turbomach., 121(3), pp. 594–602. [CrossRef]
Hoheisel, H., 1990, “Test Case E/CA-6, Subsonic Turbine Cascade T106, Test Cases for Computation of Internal Flows in Aero Engine Components,” AGARD-AR-275.
Pacciani, R., Marconcini, M., Arnone, A., and Bertini, F., 2011, “An Assessment of the Laminar Kinetic Energy Concept for the Prediction of High-Lift, Low-Reynolds Number Cascade Flows,” Proc. IMechE A: J. Power Energy, 225(7), pp. 995–1003. [CrossRef]
Michálek, J., Monaldi, M., and Arts, T., 2012, “Aerodynamic Performance of a Very High Lift Low Pressure Turbine Airfoil (T106C) at Low Reynolds and High Mach Number With Effect of Free Stream Turbulence Intensity,” ASME J. Turbomach., 134(6), p. 061009. [CrossRef]
Himmel, C., and Hodson, H., 2009, “Modifying Ultra-High Lift Low Pressure Turbine Blades for Low Reynolds Number Applications,” 12 ISUAAAT, London, UK, September 1–4, Paper No. I12-S7-3.
Lodefier, K., and Dick, E., 2006, “Modelling of Unsteady Transition in Low-Pressure Turbine Blade Flows With Two Dynamic Intermittency Equations,” Flow Turbul. Combust., 76, pp. 103–132. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

T108 cascade: experimental [16] and computed Reynolds number lapse rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

T106C cascade: experimental [34] and computed cascade lapse rates for different freestream turbulence levels

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

T108 cascade: experimental [16] and computed isentropic Mach number distributions along the blade suction side (a) Re2,is = 0.8×105 (b) Re2,is = 1.4×105 (c) Re2,is = 2×105

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

T108 cascade: wall shear stress distributions (a) Re2,is = 0.8×105 (b) Re2,is = 2×105

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Analyzed cascades configurations, (b) T106C – single-block O-type grid 641×101

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Turbulence decay upstream of the T106C and T108 cascades (Re2,is = 1.6×105)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

T106C cascade: experimental [34] and computed Reynolds number lapse (Tu∞ = 0.8%)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

T106C cascade: experimental [34] and computed isentropic Mach number distributions for different freestream turbulence levels (Re2,is = 0.8×105)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

T106C cascade: experimental [34] and computed isentropic Mach number distributions along the blade suction side (Tu∞ = 0.8%) (a) Re2,is = 0.8×105 (b) Re2,is = 1.6×105 (c) Re2,is = 2.5×105

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

T106C cascade: steady and unsteady isentropic Mach number distributions (a) Re2,is = 1×105, (b) Re2,is = 1.4×105, and (c) steady and unsteady cascade lapse rates

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

T106C cascade: space time diagrams (a) turbulence indicator function (b) laminar kinetic energy, Re2,is = 1.4×105, Tu∞=0.8%

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

T106A cascade: (a) experimental [6] and computed steady and unsteady pressure coefficient distributions, (b) steady boundary layer shape factor, (Re2,is = 1×105, Tu∞ = 4.0%)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

T106A cascade: space time diagrams boundary layer shape factor (a) LKE-based model (b) γ-R˜eθt LM model, (c) measured [6]



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In