Research Papers

Predictive Large Eddy Simulation for Jet Aeroacoustics–Current Approach and Industrial Application

[+] Author and Article Information
James Tyacke

Department of Engineering,
University of Cambridge,
Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
e-mail: jct53@cam.ac.uk

Iftekhar Naqavi, Zhong-Nan Wang, Paul Tucker

Department of Engineering,
University of Cambridge,
Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK

Peer Boehning

System Design, Aeroacoustics
Rolls-Royce Deutschland
Dahlewitz, Germany

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the International Gas Turbine Institute (IGTI) of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF TURBOMACHINERY. Manuscript received September 9, 2016; final manuscript received December 16, 2016; published online March 15, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Rakesh Srivastava.

J. Turbomach 139(8), 081003 (Mar 15, 2017) (13 pages) Paper No: TURBO-16-1234; doi: 10.1115/1.4035662 History: Received September 09, 2016; Revised December 16, 2016

The major techniques for measuring jet noise have significant drawbacks, especially when including engine installation effects such as jet–flap interaction noise. Numerical methods including low order correlations and Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) are known to be deficient for complex configurations and even simple jet flows. Using high fidelity numerical methods such as large eddy simulation (LES) allows conditions to be carefully controlled and quantified. LES methods are more practical and affordable than experimental campaigns. The potential to use LES methods to predict noise, identify noise risks, and thus modify designs before an engine or aircraft is built is a possibility in the near future. This is particularly true for applications at lower Reynolds numbers such as jet noise of business jets and jet-flap interaction noise for under-wing engine installations. Hence, we introduce our current approaches to predicting jet noise reliably and contrast the cost of RANS–numerical-LES (RANS–NLES) with traditional methods. Our own predictions and existing literature are used to provide a current guide, encompassing numerical aspects, meshing, and acoustics processing. Other approaches are also briefly considered. We also tackle the crucial issues of how codes can be validated and verified for acoustics and how LES-based methods can be introduced into industry. We consider that hybrid RANS–(N)LES is now of use to industry and contrast costs, indicating the clear advantages of eddy resolving methods.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


ACARE, 2001, “ European Aeronautics: A Vision for 2020,” Advisory Council for Aviation Research and Innovation in Europe, European Commission, Luxembourg.
Bodony, D. J. , and Lele, S. K. , 2008, “ Current Status of Jet Noise Predictions Using Large-Eddy Simulation,” AIAA J., 46(2), pp. 364–380. [CrossRef]
Bailly, C. , and Juve, D. , 2000, “ Numerical Solution of Acoustic Propagation Problem Using Linearised Euler Equations,” AIAA J., 38(1), pp. 22–29. [CrossRef]
Bogey, C. , and Bailly, C. , 2010, “ Influence of Nozzle-Exit Boundary-Layer Conditions on the Flow and Acoustic Fields on Initially Laminar Jets,” J. Fluid Mech., 663, pp. 507–538. [CrossRef]
Ffowcs Williams, J. E. , and Hawkings, D. L. , 1969, “ Sound Generation by Turbulence and Surfaces in Arbitrary Motion,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A, 264(1151), pp. 321–342. [CrossRef]
Pérez Arroyo, C. , Daviller, G. , Puigt, G. , and Airiau, C. , 2015, “ Modal Structure of a Supersonic Under-Expanded Jet,” 22ème Congrès Français de Mécanique, Lyons, France Aug. 24–28.
Pérez Arroyo, C. , Puigt, G. , and Boussuge, J.-F. , 2016, “ Large Eddy Simulation of Shock-Cell Noise From a Dual Stream Jet,” AIAA Paper No. 2016-2798.
Pérez Arroyo, C. , Daviller, G. , Puigt, G. , and Airiau, C. , 2015, “ Hydrodynamic—Acoustic Filtering of a Supersonic Under-Expanded Jet,” ERCOFTAC Workshop Direct and Large-Eddy Simulation 10, (DLES10), Limassol, Cyprus, May 27–29.
Gefen, L. , Pérez Arroyo, C. , Camussi, R. , Puigt, G. , and Airiau, C. , 2016, “ Broadband Shock-Cell Noise Signature Identification Using a Wavelet-Based Method,” AIAA Paper No. 2016-2732.
Granados-Ortiz, F.-J. , Lai, C.-H. , Pérez Arroyo, C. , Puigt, G. , and Airiau, C. , 2016, “ Uncertainty Quantification and Sensitivity Analysis Applied to an Under-Expanded Single Jet,” AIAA Paper No. 2016-4091.
Gand, F. , 2016, “ Investigation of Turbulence Development in Incompressible Jets With Zonal Detached Eddy Simulation (ZDES) and Synthetic Turbulent Inflow,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 61(B), pp. 425–437. [CrossRef]
Shur, M. L. , Spalart, P. R. , Strelets, M. K. , and Travin, A. K. , 2015, “ An Enhanced Version of DES With Rapid Transition From RANS to LES in Separated Flows,” Flow, Turbul. Combust., 95(1), pp. 709–737. [CrossRef]
Brunet, V. , 2012, “ Random Flow Generation Technique for Civil Aircraft Jet Simulations With the ZDES Approach,” Progress in Hybrid RANS-LES Modelling, Vol. 117, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 193–204.
Bres, G. A. , Jaunet, V. , Le Rallic, M. , Jordan, P. , Colonius, T. , and Lele, S. K. , 2015, “ Large Eddy Simulation for Jet Noise: The Importance of Getting the Boundary Layer Right,” AIAA Paper No. 2015-2535.
Cetin, M. O. , Pauz, V. , Meinke, M. , and Schröder, W. , 2016, “ Computational Analysis of Nozzle Geometry Variations for Subsonic Turbulent Jets,” Comput. Fluids, 136, pp. 467–484. [CrossRef]
Verrière, J. , Gand, F. , and Deck, S. , 2016, “ Zonal Detached-Eddy Simulations of a Dual-Stream Jet,” AIAA J., 54(10), pp. 3176–3190. [CrossRef]
Tyacke, J. C. , Mahak, M. , and Tucker, P. G. , 2016, “ Large-Scale Multifidelity, Multiphysics, Hybrid Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes/Large-Eddy Simulation of an Installed Aeroengine,” J. Propul. Power, 32(4), pp. 997–1008. [CrossRef]
Vogel, P. , Bin, J. , and Sinha, N. , 2016, “ LES Predictions of Jet Noise for a Pylon-Mounted Dual Stream Nozzle and Jet Surface Interactions,” ASME Paper No. GT2016-58175.
Rahier, G. , Huet, M. , and Prieur, J. , 2015, “ Additional Terms for the Use of Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings Surface Integrals in Turbulent Flows,” Comput. Fluids, 120, pp. 158–172. [CrossRef]
Lyubimov, D. A. , 2012, “ Development and Application of a High-Resolution Technique for Jet Flow Computation Using Large Eddy Simulation,” High Temp., 50(3), pp. 420–436. [CrossRef]
Rosa, V. , Self, R. , Ilario, C. , Naqavi, I. , and Tucker, P. G. , 2016, “ Modelling Velocity Correlations With LES and RANS for Prediction of Noise From Isothermal and Hot Jets,” AIAA Paper No. 2016-2810.
Karabasov, S. A. , Afsar, M. Z. , Hynes, T. P. , Dowling, A. P. , McMullan, W. A. , Pokora, C. D. , Page, G. J. , and McGuirk, J. J. , 2010, “ Jet Noise: Acoustic Analogy Informed by Large Eddy Simulation,” AIAA J., 48(7), pp. 1312–1325. [CrossRef]
Depuru Mohan, N. K. , and Dowling, A. P. , 2016, “ Jet-Noise-Prediction Model for Chevrons and Microjets,” AIAA J., 54(12), pp. 3928–3940. [CrossRef]
Towne, A. , Jordan, P. , Colonius, T. , Jaunet, V. , Schmidt, O. T. , and Bres, G. A. , 2016, “ Trapped Acoustic Waves in the Potential Core of Subsonic Jets,” AIAA Paper No. 2016-2809.
Lapworth, B. , 2004, “ HYDRA CFD: A Framework for Collaborative CFD Development,” International Conference on Scientific and Engineering Computation (IC-SEC), Singapore, June 30–July 2.
Naqavi, I. Z. , Mahak, M. , Wang, Z.-N. , Tucker, P. G. , and Strange, P. , 2014, “ An Assessment of Far-Field Noise Prediction for Subsonic Jets Using Large Eddy Simulation and Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings Method,” 22nd Annual Conference of the CFD Society of Canada, Toronto, Canada, June 1–4, Paper No. 323.
Wang, Z.-N. , Naqavi, I. Z. , Mahak, M. , Tucker, P. G. , Yuan, X. , and Strange, P. , 2014, “ Far Field Noise Prediction for Subsonic Hot and Cold Jets Using Large-Eddy Simulation,” ASME Paper No. GT2014-27290.
Xia, H. , Tucker, P. G. , and Eastwood, S. , 2009, “ Large-Eddy Simulations of Chevron Jet Flows With Noise Predictions,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 30(6), pp. 1067–1079. [CrossRef]
Tyacke, J. , Tucker, P. , Jefferson-Loveday, R. , Rao Vadlamani, N. , Watson, R. , Naqavi, I. , and Yang, X. , 2013, “ Large Eddy Simulation for Turbines: Methodologies, Cost and Future Outlooks,” ASME J. Turbomach., 136(6), p. 061009. [CrossRef]
Tyacke, J. C. , and Tucker, P. G. , 2015, “ Future Use of Large Eddy Simulation in Aero-Engines,” ASME J. Turbomach., 137(8), p. 081005. [CrossRef]
Spalart, P. R. , and Allmaras, S. R. , 1994, “ A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows,” Rech. Aérosp., 1(1), pp. 5–21.
Tucker, P. G. , 2003, “ Differential Equation-Based Wall Distance Computation for DES and RANS,” J. Comput. Phys., 190(1), pp. 229–248. [CrossRef]
Smagorinsky, J. , 1963, “ General Circulation Experiments With the Primitive Equations—I: The Basic Experiment,” Mon. Weather Rev., 91(3), pp. 99–165. [CrossRef]
Watson, R. , Tucker, P. G. , Wang, Z.-N. , and Yuan, X. , 2015, “ Towards Robust Unstructured Turbomachinery Large Eddy Simulation,” Comput. Fluids, 118, pp. 245–254. [CrossRef]
Jameson, A. , 2007, “ Formulation of Kinetic Energy Preserving Conservative Schemes for Gas Dynamics and Direct Numerical Simulation of One-Dimensional Viscous Compressible Flow in a Shock Tube Using Entropy and Kinetic Energy Preserving Schemes,” J. Sci. Comput., 34(2), pp. 188–208. [CrossRef]
Kawai, S. , Shankar, S. K. , and Lele, S. K. , 2010, “ Assessment of Localized Artificial Diffusivity Scheme for Large-Eddy Simulation of Compressible Turbulent Flows,” J. Comput. Phys., 229(5), pp. 1739–1762. [CrossRef]
Hill, D. , and Pullin, D. , 2004, “ Hybrid Tuned Center-Difference-WENO Method for Large Eddy Simulations in the Presence of Strong Shocks,” J. Comput. Phys., 194(2), pp. 435–450. [CrossRef]
Tam, C. K. W. , 1998, “ Advances in Numerical Boundary Conditions for Computational Aeroacoustics,” J. Comput. Acoust., 6(4), pp. 377–402. [CrossRef]
Bogey, C. , and Bailly, C. , 2002, “ Three-Dimensional Non-Reflective Boundary Conditions for Acoustic Simulations: Far Field Formulation and Validation Test Cases,” Acta Acust. Acust., 88(4), pp. 463–471.
Poinsot, T. J. , and Lelef, S. K. , 1992, “ Boundary Conditions for Direct Simulations of Compressible Viscous Flows,” J. Comput. Phys., 101(1), pp. 104–129. [CrossRef]
Bogey, C. , Marsden, O. , and Bailly, C. , 2012, “ Influence of Initial Turbulence Level on the Flow and Sound Fields of a Subsonic Jet at a Diameter-Based Reynolds Number of 105,” J. Fluid Mech., 701(5), pp. 352–385. [CrossRef]
Uzun, A. , and Hussaini, M. Y. , 2012, “ Some Issues in Large-Eddy Simulations for Chevron Nozzle Jet Flows,” J. Propul. Power, 28(2), pp. 246–258. [CrossRef]
Birch, S. F. , 2006, “ A Review of Axisymmetric Jet Flow Data for Noise Applications,” AIAA Paper No. 2006-2602.
Batten, P. , Goldberg, U. , and Chakravarthy, S. , 2004, “ Interfacing Statistical Turbulence Closures With Large-Eddy Simulation,” AIAA J., 42(3), pp. 485–492. [CrossRef]
Keating, A. , Piomelli, U. , Balaras, E. , and Kaltenbach, H.-J. , 2004, “ A Priori and a Posteriori Tests of Inflow Conditions for Large-Eddy Simulation,” Phys. Fluids, 16(12), pp. 4696–4712. [CrossRef]
Perret, L. , Delville, J. , Manceau, R. , and Bonnet, J.-P. , 2008, “ Turbulent Inflow Conditions for Large-Eddy Simulation Based on Low-Order Empirical Model,” Phys. Fluids, 20(7), p. 075107. [CrossRef]
Laraufie, R. , Deck, S. , and Sagaut, P. , 2011, “ A Dynamic Forcing Method for Unsteady Turbulent Inflow Conditions,” J. Comput. Phys., 230(23), pp. 8647–8663. [CrossRef]
Lund, T. S. , Wu, X. , and Squires, K. D. , 1998, “ Generation of Turbulent Inflow Data for Spatially-Developing Boundary Layer Simulations,” J. Comput. Phys., 140(2), pp. 233–258. [CrossRef]
Tucker, P. , Coupland, J. , Eastwood, S. , Liu, Y. , Jefferson-Loveday, R. , and Hassan, O. , 2006, “ Contrasting Code Performances for Computational Aeroacoustics of Jets,” AIAA Paper No. 2006-2672.
Mendez, S. , Shoeybi, M. , Sharma, A. , Ham, F. E. , Lele, S. K. , and Moin, P. , 2012, “ Large-Eddy Simulations of Perfectly Expanded Supersonic Jets Using an Unstructured Solver,” AIAA J., 50(5), pp. 1103–1118. [CrossRef]
Shur, M. L. , Spalart, P. R. , and Strelets, M. K. , 2005, “ Noise Prediction for Increasingly Complex Jets—Part I: Methods and Tests,” Int. J. Aeroacoustics, 4(3–4), pp. 213–246. [CrossRef]
Bres, G. A. , Nichols, J. W. , Lele, S. K. , and Ham, F. E. , 2012, “ Towards Best Practices for Jet Noise Predictions With Unstructured Large Eddy Simulations,” AIAA Paper No. 2012-2965.
Brès, G. A. , Khalighi, Y. , Ham, F. , and Lele, S. K. , 2011, “ Unstructured Large Eddy Simulation Technology for Aeroacoustics of Complex Jet Flows,” 40th International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering ( Inter-Noise 2011), Osaka, Japan, Sept. 4–7, pp. 401–410.
Brown, C. , and Bridges, J. , 2006, “ Acoustic Efficiency of Azimuthal Modes in Jet Noise Using Chevron Nozzles,” AIAA Paper No. 2006-2645.
Mendez, S. , Shoeybi, M. , Lele, S. K. , and Moin, P. , 2013, “ On the Use of the Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings Equation to Predict Far-Field Jet Noise From Large-Eddy Simulations,” Int. J. Aeroacoustics, 12(1–2), pp. 1–20. [CrossRef]
Mendez, S. , Shoeybi, M. , Sharma, A. , Lele, S. K. , and Moin, P. , 2009, “ Post-Processing of Large-Eddy Simulations for Jet Noise Predictions,” Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, Annual Research Briefs, pp. 17–31.
Naqavi, I. Z. , Wang, Z.-N. , and Tucker, P. G. , 2016, “ Far-Field Noise Prediction for Jets Using Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) and Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings (FW-H) Method,” Int. J. Aeroacoustics, 15(8), pp. 757–780. [CrossRef]
Meuer, H. , Strohmaier, E. , Dongarra, J. , Simon, H. , and Meuer, S. , 2015, “ Top 500 Supercomputer List,” www.top500.org.
Bridges, J. , and Wernet, M. P. , 2010, “ Establishing Consensus Turbulence Statistics for Hot Subsonic Jets,” AIAA Paper 2010-3751.
Tinney, C. E. , and Jordan, P. , 2008, “ The Near Pressure Field of Co-Axial Subsonic Jets,” J. Fluid Mech., 611, pp. 175–204. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Definition of certification points for the noise measurement: approach, fly-over, and sideline

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Open jet facility to measure jet noise with a flight stream

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Flow features and turbulence modeling approach

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Validation of the KEP scheme on the canonical flow cases: (a) Tollmien–Schlichting wave and (b) homogeneous isotropic decaying turbulence

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The axial velocity field of a subsonic jet simulated by KEP scheme and Roe scheme: (a) KEP scheme and (b) Roe scheme

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Axial velocity and turbulence intensity along the centerline and nozzle lipline: (a) axial velocity and (b) turbulence intensity

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Numerical boundary treatment illustration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Typical round nozzle mesh topology

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparison of current axial and radial mesh spacings with other literature, i.e., number of spacings per notional jet diameter along SLo: (a) axial and (b) radial

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Structured and hybrid axial mesh planes showing azimuthal mesh structure: (a) structured and (b) hybrid

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Hybrid structured–unstructured mesh for (a), an isolated nozzle with the inset showing the structured-unstructured interface and (b), an initial installed round coaxial nozzle with an inset showing regions of different axial resolution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

RANS–NLES of an installed engine with internal geometry modeling

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

(a) Unstructured hexahedral Octree mesh of an installed nozzle and (b) axial velocity contours at x/D = 3 (1D downstream of the wing trailing edge)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Localized unstructured meshing of a chevron nozzle: (a) topology and (b) example initial mesh cut-plane

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Multiple FW-H surfaces with upstream and multiple downstream closing disks

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

OASPL and SPL spectra for the hot, cold and cold jet with flight stream without closing disks: (a) hot jet, (b) cold jet, (c) cold jet with flight stream, (d) hot jet, (e) cold jet, and (f) cold jet with flight stream

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

OASPL and SPL spectra for the hot, cold, and cold jet with flight stream with closing disks: (a) hot jet, (b) cold jet, (c) cold jet with flight stream, (d) hot jet, (e) cold jet, and (f) cold jet with flight stream

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Example expert system-based process for LES of complex jet aeroacoustics



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In