Research Papers

Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Secondary Flow Structures in an Annular Low Pressure Turbine Cascade Under Periodic Wake Impact—Part 1: Experimental Results

[+] Author and Article Information
Martin Sinkwitz

Chair of Thermal Turbomachines
and Aeroengines
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Ruhr-Universität Bochum,
Bochum, 44801, Germany
e-mail: martin.sinkwitz@rub.de

Benjamin Winhart, David Engelmann, Francesca di Mare

Chair of Thermal Turbomachines
and Aeroengines
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Ruhr-Universität Bochum,
Bochum, 44801, Germany

Ronald Mailach

Chair of Turbomachinery and Flight Propulsion,
Institute of Fluid Mechanics,
Technische Universität Dresden,
Dresden, 01062, Germany

Manuscript received February 15, 2018; final manuscript received September 19, 2018; published online January 31, 2019. Assoc. Editor: Coutier-Delgosha Olivier.

J. Turbomach 141(2), 021008-021009-8 (Jan 31, 2019) (8 pages) Paper No: TURBO-18-1035; doi: 10.1115/1.4042284 History: Received February 15, 2018; Revised September 19, 2018

Experimental studies have been conducted on a modified T106 low pressure turbine (LPT) profile in an annular 1.5 stage axial turbine rig at the Chair of Thermal Turbomachines and Aeroengines, Ruhr-Universität Bochum. The rig setup allows the highly resolved measurement of unsteady wake–stator flow interaction in both space and time. Incoming wakes are generated by a variable-speed driven rotor equipped with cylindrical bars. In the present paper, an experimental approach to the investigation of unsteady phenomena is proposed. Time-averaged and instantaneous measurement data from 2D flow field traverses at the stator exit are provided for the analysis of the periodically unsteady vortex formation, displacement, and suppression. Additional time-accurate blade pressure data are used to study the relationship between the flow structures downstream of the stator row and the immediate intermittent wake impact on the blades. Bar wake kinematics is also discussed in relation to the observations.

Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Denton, J. D. , 1993, “ The 1993 IGTI Scholar Lecture: Loss Mechanisms in Turbomachines,” ASME J. Turbomach., 115(4), pp. 621–656. [CrossRef]
Langston, L. S. , 2001, “ Secondary Flows in Axial Turbines—A Review,” Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 934(1), pp. 11–26. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Puddu, P. , Palomba, C. , and Nurzia, F. , 2006, “ Time-Space Evolution of Secondary Flow Structures in a Two-Stage Low-Speed Turbine,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90787.
Kang, S. , and Hirsch, C. , 1991, “ Three Dimensional Flow in a Linear Compressor Cascade at Design Conditions,” ASME Paper No. 91-GT-114.
Goldstein, R. J. , and Spores, R. A. , 1988, “ Turbulent Transport on the Endwall in the Region Between Adjacent Turbine Blades,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 110(4a), pp. 862–869. [CrossRef]
Hawthorne, W. R. , 1955, “ Rotational Flow Through Cascades—Part 1: The Components of Vorticity,” Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math., 8(3), pp. 266–279. [CrossRef]
Ciorciari, R. , Kirik, I. , and Niehuis, R. , 2014, “ Effects of Unsteady Wakes on the Secondary Flows in the Linear T106 Turbine Cascade,” ASME J. Turbomach., 136(9), p. 091010. [CrossRef]
Krug, A. , Busse, P. , and Vogeler, K. , 2015, “ Experimental Investigation Into the Effects of the Steady Wake-Tip Clearance Vortex Interaction in a Compressor Cascade,” ASME J. Turbomach., 137(6), p. 061006. [CrossRef]
Volino, R. J. , 2011, “ Effect of Unsteady Wakes on Boundary Layer Separation on a Very High Lift Low Pressure Turbine Airfoil,” ASME J. Turbomach., 134(1), p. 011011.
Lengani, D. , Simoni, D. , Ubaldi, M. , Zunino, P. , and Bertini, F. , 2017, “ Time Resolved PIV Measurements of the Unsteady Wake Migration in a LPT Blade Passage: Effect of the Wake Passing Frequency,” 12th European Conference on Turbomachinery, Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics (ETC), Apr. 3–7, Stockholm, Sweden, Paper No. ETC2017-324. https://www.euroturbo.eu/publications/proceedings-papers/etc2017-324/
Lampart, P. , 2009, “ Investigation of Endwall Flows and Losses in Axial Turbines—Part I: Formation of Endwall Flows and Losses,” J. Theor. Appl. Mech., 47(2), pp. 321–342. http://www.ptmts.org.pl/jtam/index.php/jtam/article/view/v47n2p321
Hodson, H. P. , and Howell, R. J. , 2005, “ The Role of Transition in High-Lift Low-pressure Turbines for Aeroengines,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 41(6), pp. 419–454. [CrossRef]
Sinkwitz, M. , Engelmann, D. , and Mailach, R. , 2017, “ Experimental Investigation of Periodically Unsteady Wake Impact on Secondary Flow in a 1.5 Stage Full Annular LPT Cascade With Modified T106 Blading,” ASME Paper No. GT2017-64390.
Berrino, M. , Lengani, D. , Simoni, D. , Ubaldi, M. , Zunino, P. , and Bertini, F. , 2015, “ Dynamics and Turbulence Characteristics of Wake-Boundary Layer Interaction in a Low Pressure Turbine Blade,” ASME Paper No. GT2015-42626.
Stieger, R. D. , and Hodson, H. P. , 2004, “ The Transition Mechanism of Highly Loaded Low-Pressure Turbine Blades,” ASME J. Turbomach., 126(4), pp. 536–543. [CrossRef]
Winhart, B. , Sinkwitz, M. , Schramm, A. , Engelmann, D. , di Mare, F. , and Mailach, R. , 2017, “ Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Secondary Flow Structures in an Annular LPT Cascade Under Periodical Wake Impact—Part 2: Numerical Results,” ASME J. Turbomach. (accepted).


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Test facility. The sectional view of the test section (a), 3D illustration (b), and view onto the T106RUB stator row (c).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Time-resolved flow field at 0.15 C downstream of TE. Time-space evolution of AVO (isocontours) between R/H =0% and R/H =100% (Sr = 1.55 and ϕ = 0.83).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Time-resolved flow field at 0.15C downstream of TE. Time-space evolution of Δc (top) and AVO (bottom) for three positions at constant span (Sr = 1.55 and ϕ = 0.83).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Time-averaged flow field at 0.15 C downstream of TE. AVO distributions for the undisturbed case (a) and for wake disturbed inflow (Sr = 1.55 and ϕ = 0.83) (b).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

T106RUB blade for time-resolved profile pressure measurements. SS view, prepared for Kulite LQ-125 instrumentation (a), and the arrangement of sensors (b).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Time-averaged cp distributions at T106RUB midspan for three different operating points. The magnification of situation at LE (details A + B) and TE (detail C).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Time-space evolution of T106RUB profile pressure fluctuations (midspan) for operating points with light (a), intermediate (b), and heavy (c) perturbation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

T106RUB profile pressure fluctuations at midspan. Temporal evolution for one bar passing, divided into four time instants (Sr = 1.55 and ϕ = 0.83).



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In