To determine the extent of backflow encountered with currently used prosthetic valves, four types of aortic valves with comparable orifice diameters were tested in a pulse duplicating system. These were a Hancock porcine valve, a Lillehei-Kaster pivoting disk valve, a St. Jude bileaflet valve and a Bjo¨rk-Shiley tilting disk valve. Mean aortic pressure was sequentially increased from 83 to 147 mmHg, keeping the pump rate essentially constant (69–73 strokes/min). The porcine valve produced the least amount of total backflow (backflow due to closure plus leakage backflow) (1.6 to 2.4 mL/stroke). Among the mechanical valves the Bjo¨rk-Shiley valve showed the least amount of total backflow (5.0 to 6.0 mL/stroke). At a mean aortic pressure of 100 mmHg and a low cardiac output of 2 L/min, the total backflow with the porcine valve was only 6 percent of forward flow; whereas it was 19 percent with the Lillehei-Kaster valve, 22 percent with the St. Jude valve and 18 percent with the Bjo¨rk-Shiley valve. Leakage backflow at a given level of mean aortic pressure was, as expected, directly related to the annular clearance area. It is concluded that the Hancock valve showed the least amount of backward flow, which would be particularly beneficial in low output states. In the presence of normal hemodynamics, the amount of backflow with the three mechanical valves appeared to be well below the level of backflow considered to be clinically significant.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
February 1984
Research Papers
Comparative Study of the Amount of Backflow Produced by Four Types of Aortic Valve Prostheses
H. N. Sabbah,
H. N. Sabbah
Department of Medicine (Division of Cardiovascular Medicine), and Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich. 48202
Search for other works by this author on:
P. D. Stein
P. D. Stein
Department of Medicine (Division of Cardiovascular Medicine), and Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich. 48202
Search for other works by this author on:
H. N. Sabbah
Department of Medicine (Division of Cardiovascular Medicine), and Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich. 48202
P. D. Stein
Department of Medicine (Division of Cardiovascular Medicine), and Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich. 48202
J Biomech Eng. Feb 1984, 106(1): 66-71 (6 pages)
Published Online: February 1, 1984
Article history
Received:
March 24, 1982
Revised:
October 18, 1983
Online:
June 15, 2009
Citation
Sabbah, H. N., and Stein, P. D. (February 1, 1984). "Comparative Study of the Amount of Backflow Produced by Four Types of Aortic Valve Prostheses." ASME. J Biomech Eng. February 1984; 106(1): 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3138459
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Related Articles
Numerical Study of Shear-Induced Thrombus Formation Over Aterial Stent Struts
J. Med. Devices (June,2009)
Design of a Pulsatile Flow Facility to Evaluate Thrombogenic Potential of Implantable Cardiac Devices
J Biomech Eng (April,2015)
A Design Framework of Unloaded Leaflet Shape for the Ovine Pulmonary Valve Single Leaflet Replacement Surgery
J. Med. Devices (June,2011)
Novel Transaortic Double Barrel Ventricular Cannula
J. Med. Devices (June,2009)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Dynamic Behavior of Pumping Systems
Pipeline Pumping and Compression Systems: A Practical Approach
Later Single-Cylinder Engines
Air Engines: The History, Science, and Reality of the Perfect Engine
Section III: Subsections NC and ND — Class 2 and 3 Components
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 1, Third Edition