By combining Computer Aided Tolerance (CAT) simulation tools with Virtual Reality (VR) tools, virtual environments for non-nominal geometry verification can be utilized. This paper presents the results from an experimental study, conducted at Volvo Car Corporation, which investigates the perceptional aspects that are related to verification of visual quality appearance, using non-nominal virtual models. Although a realistic non-nominal model is created, the interpretation, i.e. how the model is perceived, must be clarified. Since the effect of geometric variation is a specific application, with high demands on realistic and detailed representation, perceptional studies are needed to ensure that VR and other virtual representations can be used for this kind of application. In this paper, two environments are compared, one physical and one corresponding virtual environment. Three adjusted physical vehicles are mapped to the virtual environment and compared using non-immersive desktop VR in a visualization experiment with test subjects from the automotive industry. The study indicates that virtual objects are judged as less good-looking compared to physical objects. There is also a higher degree of uncertainness when judging virtual objects.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
automobile industry, virtual reality, data visualisation, digital simulation, knowledge representation, Virtual Reality, Geometry Verification, Perception of Non-Nominal VR Models, Tolerance Management
Topics:
Geometry, Vehicles, Virtual reality, Automotive industry, Visualization
1.
So¨derberg
,
R.
, and
Lindkvist
,
L.
,
1999
, “
Computer Aided Assembly Robustness Evaluation
,”
J. Eng. Design
,
10
(
2
), pp.
165
–
181
.
2.
So¨derberg, R., and Lindkvist, L., 1999, “Two-Step Procedure for Robust Design Using CAT Technology,” Proceedings of the 6th CIRP International Seminar on Computer Aided Tolerancing, Enschede, the Netherlands.
3.
Chase
,
K. W.
, and
Greenwood
,
W. H.
,
1988
, “
Design Issues in Mechanical Tolerance Analysis
,”
Manuf. Rev.
,
1
(
1
), pp.
50
–
59
.
4.
So¨derberg, R., and Lindkvist, L., 2001, “Automated Seam Variation and Stability Analysis for Automobile Body Design,” The 7th CIRP International Seminar on Computer Aided Tolerancing, ENS de Cachan, France.
5.
Wickman
,
C.
, and
So¨derberg
,
R.
,
2003
, “
Increased Concurrency Between Styling and Design Using CAT Technology Combined with Virtual Reality
,”
Journal of Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications
,
11
(
1
), pp.
7
–
15
.
6.
May
,
J.
,
2000
, “
Perceptual Principles and Computer Graphics
,”
Computer Graphics Forum—The International Journal of the Eurographics Association
,
19
(
4
), pp.
271
–
279
.
7.
Maxfield, J., Dew, P. M., Zhao, J., Juster, N. P., Taylor, S., Fitchie, M., Ion, W. J., and Thompson, M., 2000, “Predicting Product Cosmetic Quality using Virtual Environment,” Proceedings of 2000 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
8.
Maxfield, J., Dew, P. M., Zhao, J., Juster, N. P., Taylor, S., Fitchie M., and Ion, W. J., 2000, “Predicting Product Cosmetic Quality in the Automobile Industry,” Proceedings of the 33rd International Symposium on Automotive Technology and Automation, Dublin, Ireland.
9.
Wickman, C. G., So¨derberg, R., and Lindkvist, L., 2001, “Toward Non-Nominal Virtual Geometric Verification by Combining VR and CAT Technologies,” Proceedings of The 7th CIRP International Seminar on Computer Aided Tolerancing, ENS de Cachan, France.
10.
Wickman, C., and So¨derberg, R., 2001, “Defining Quality Appearance Index Weights by Combining VR and CAT Technologies,” Proceedings of DETC’01 ASME 2001 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
11.
Hubona
,
G. J.
,
Wheeler
,
P. N.
,
Shirah
,
G. W.
, and
Brandt
,
M.
,
1999
, “
The Relative Contributions of Stereo, Lighting, and Background Scenes In Promoting 3D Depth Visualization
,”
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
,
6
(
3
), pp.
1
–
29
.
12.
Thompson, W. B., Willemsen, P., Gooch, A. A., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Loomis, J. M., and Beall, A. C., 2002, “Does the Quality of the Computer Graphics Matter When Judging Distances in Visually Immersive Environments?,” Technical Report UUCS-02-015, School of Computing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
13.
Wanger
,
L. R.
,
Ferwerda
,
J. A.
, and
Greenberg
,
D. P.
,
1992
, “
Perceiving Spatial Relationships in Computer-Generated Images
,”
IEEE Comput. Graphics Appl.
,
pp.
44
–
58
.
14.
Opticore, 2000, Opus Studio Software Manual, Opticore AB, Go¨teborg.
15.
Svensson
,
E.
, and
Holm
,
S.
,
1994
, “
Separation of Systematic and Random Differences in Ordinal Rating Scales
,”
Statistics in Medicine
,
13
, pp.
2437
–
2453
.
Copyright © 2004
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.