The Delayed Resonator (DR) is a recent active vibration absorption technique which uses time delayed position feedback generating ideal resonance feature in a passive vibration absorber. This objective can also be achieved using proportional and derivative (PD) control as well as other more sophisticated routines such as LQR, sliding mode control. In this paper, DR technique is compared with PD, a widely adopted control strategy. Actuator dynamics is taken into account in analyzing the system. An analytical comparison is presented which is followed by an experimental validation of the findings using a single-degree-of-freedom primary structure and an absorber with electromagnetic actuator. Both analytical and experimental results show that the DR and PD implementations can be equally effective in suppressing undesired oscillations. The latter, however, requires a velocity observer, which is an additional complexity beyond the DR feedback structure. [S0022-0434(00)02203-6]

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
electromagnetic actuators, vibration control, two-term control, delays, resonators, feedback
Topics:
Actuators, Delays, Dynamics (Mechanics), Electromagnetic actuators, Feedback, Stability, Vibration absorbers, Resonance, Absorption
1.
Frahm, H., 1911, “Device for Damping Vibration of Bodies,” US patent #: 989,958.
2.
Den Hartog
,
J. P.
, and
Ormondroyd
,
J.
,
1928
, “
Theory of the Dynamic Vibration Absorber
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
50
, pp.
11
–
22
.
3.
Warburton
,
G. B.
, and
Ayorinde
,
E. O.
,
1980
, “
Optimum absorber parameters for simple systems
,”
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dynam.
,
8
, pp.
197
–
217
.
4.
Jalili, N., and Olgac, N., 1998, “Optimum Design of Delayed Feedback Vibration Absorber Against Wide Band Excitations,” IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Tampa, FL, pp. 4734–4739.
5.
Puksand
,
H.
,
1975
, “
Optimum conditions for dynamic vibration absorbers for variable speed systems with rotating and reciprocating unbalance
,”
Int. J. Mech. Eng. Edu.
,
3
, pp.
145
–
152
.
6.
Soom
,
A.
, and
Lee
,
M.-S.
,
1983
, “
Optimal design of linear and nonlinear absorbers for damped systems
,”
ASME J. Vib. Acoust., Stress, Reliab. Des.
,
105
, pp.
112
–
119
.
7.
Seto
,
K.
, and
Yamashita
,
S.
,
1991
, “
Simultaneous Optimum Design Method for Multiple Dynamic Absorbers to Control Multiple Resonance Peaks
,”
SAE Trans.
,
100
, pp.
1481
–
1489
.
8.
Yamashita
,
S.
,
Sawatari
,
K.
, and
Seto
,
K.
,
1990
, “
Vibration Control of Piping System by Dual Dynamic Absorber
,”
JSME Int. J.
,
33
, No.
4
, p.
488
488
.
9.
Von Flotow, A. H., Beard, A., and Bailey, D., 1994, “Adaptive Tuned Vibration Absorbers: Tuning Laws, Tracking Agility, Sizing and Physical Implementations,” Proc. of NOISECON, Orlando, FL.
10.
Sun
,
J. Q.
,
Jolly
,
M. R.
, and
Norris
,
M. A.
,
1995
, “
Passive, Adaptive and Active Tuned Vibration Absorbers-A Survey
,”
ASME Special 50th Anniversary, Design Issue
,
117
, pp.
234
–
242
.
11.
Seto, K., and Furuishi, Y., 1991, “A Study on Active Dynamic Absorber,” ASME Proc., DE-Vol. 38, pp. 263–270.
12.
Olgac
,
N.
, and
Holm-Hansen
,
B.
,
1994
, “
A Novel Active Vibration Absorption Technique: Delayed Resonator
,”
J. Sound Vibr.
,
176
, pp.
93
–
104
.
13.
Olgac, N., 1994, “Delayed Resonators as Active Dynamic Absorbers,” US Patent #: 08/241,755.
14.
Olgac
,
N.
, and
Holm-Hansen
,
B.
,
1995
, “
Design Considerations for Delayed Resonator Vibration Absorber
,”
J. Eng. Mech.
,
121
, pp.
80
–
89
.
15.
Filipovic
,
D.
, and
Olgac
,
N.
,
1998
, “
Torsional Delayed Resonator with Velocity Feedback
,”
IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron.
,
3
, pp.
67
–
72
.
16.
Olgac
,
N.
, and
Hosek
,
M.
,
1997
, “
Active Vibration Absorption Using Delayed Resonator with Relative Position Measurement
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
,
119
, No.
1
, pp.
131
–
136
.
17.
Olgac
,
N.
,
Elmali
,
H.
, and
Vijayan
,
S.
,
1996
, “
Introduction to Dual Frequency Fixed Delayed Resonator (DFFDR)
,”
J. Sound Vibr.
,
189
, No.
3
, pp.
355
–
367
.
Copyright © 2000
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.