The problem of parameter estimation of permanent-magnet synchronous machines (PMSMs) can be formulated as a nonlinear optimization problem. To obtain accurate machine parameters, it is necessary to develop easily applicable but efficient optimization algorithms to solve the parameter estimation models. This paper proposes a novel dynamic differential evolution with adaptive mutation operator (AMDDE) algorithm for the multiparameter simultaneous estimation of a nonsalient pole PMSM. The dynamic updating of population enables AMDDE to responds to any improved changes of the population immediately and thus generates better optimization solutions compared with the static mechanism used in original differential evolution. Two mutation strategies, namely DE/rand/1 and DE/best/1, are adaptively employed to balance the global exploration and local exploitation. The effectiveness of the proposed AMDDE is demonstrated on the multiparameter estimation for a nonsalient pole PMSM. Experimental results indicate that the proposed method significantly outperforms the existing peer algorithms in efficiency, accuracy, and robustness. Furthermore, the new algorithm can be potentially realized in digital microcontroller due to its simple structure and lower memory requirement. The proposed algorithm can also be applied to other parameter estimation and optimization problems.
Parameter Identification of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine Based on an Adaptive Mutation Dynamic Differential Evolution
Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received June 10, 2016; final manuscript received November 10, 2016; published online March 23, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Davide Spinello.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Wu, L., Liu, Z., Wei, H., Zhong, Q., and Xiao, X. (March 23, 2017). "Parameter Identification of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine Based on an Adaptive Mutation Dynamic Differential Evolution." ASME. J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. June 2017; 139(6): 061006. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4035239
Download citation file: