Fig. 1 The schematic diagram of the interface The schematic diagram of the interface More

Fig. 2 Growth rate variation with power-law index n ( ρ = 0.001 , Q = 0.5 , Re = 50 , We = 100 , Re l = 100 , α = 0.03 ) Growth rate variation with power-law index n (ρ=0.001,Q=0.5,Re=50,We=100,Rel=100,α=0.03) More

Fig. 3 Growth rate variation with impact factor Q ( ρ = 0.001 , Re = 50 , We = 100 , n = 0.8 , Re l = 100 , α = 0.03 ) Growth rate variation with impact factor Q (ρ=0.001,Re=50,We=100,n=0.8,Rel=100,α=0.03) More

Fig. 4 Effect of Reynolds number Re ( ρ = 0.001 , Q = 0.5 , We = 100 , n = 0.8 , Re l = 100 , α = 0.03 ) Effect of Reynolds number Re (ρ=0.001,Q=0.5,We=100,n=0.8,Rel=100,α=0.03) More

Fig. 5 Effect of normalized Reynolds number Re l ( ρ = 0.001 , Q = 0.5 , Re = 50 , W e = 100 , n = 0.8 , α = 0.03 ) Effect of normalized Reynolds number Rel (ρ=0.001,Q=0.5,Re=50,We=100,n=0.8,α=0.03) More

Fig. 6 Heat transport effect on growth rate ( ρ = 0.001 , Q = 0.5 , Re = 50 , We = 100 , n = 0.8 , Re l = 100 ) Heat transport effect on growth rate (ρ=0.001,Q=0.5,Re=50,We=100,n=0.8,Rel=100) More

Fig. 7 Weber number effect on growth rate ( ρ = 0.001 , Q = 0.5 , Re = 50 , n = 0.8 , Re l = 100 , α = 0.03 ) Weber number effect on growth rate (ρ=0.001,Q=0.5,Re=50,n=0.8,Rel=100,α=0.03) More

Fig. 8 Growth rate for the various combination of the interface ( ρ = 0.001 , We = 100 , α = 0.03 ) Growth rate for the various combination of the interface (ρ=0.001,We=100,α=0.03) More

Fig. 1 Grid in computation domain Grid in computation domain More

Fig. 2 Centrifugal pump closed test rig Centrifugal pump closed test rig More

Fig. 3 Comparison of the head curve between numerical and experimental results Comparison of the head curve between numerical and experimental results More

Fig. 4 Comparison of vapor structure evolution between numerical and experimental results Comparison of vapor structure evolution between numerical and experimental results More

Fig. 5 Comparison of head losses obtained by the local entropy generation method, global entropy generation method, and pressure drop method Comparison of head losses obtained by the local entropy generation method, global entropy generation method, and pressure drop method More