Interpretation of combustion and emissions outcomes in diesel engines is often enhanced by accurate knowledge of the transient fuel delivery rate and flow characteristics of the injector nozzle. Important physical characteristics of these flows, including velocity profile and flow separation or cavitation effects, are difficult to measure directly, but can be characterized from a flow-averaged perspective through the measurement of nozzle flow coefficients, namely, the discharge, velocity, and area-contraction coefficients. Both the transient fuel mass flow rate and the flow-averaged nozzle coefficients can be found by measuring the mass and momentum flux of the fuel stream leaving the nozzle during injection through the application of an impingement technique, where fuel is sprayed onto the face of a transducer calibrated for force measurement in close proximity to the nozzle. While several published experiments have employed the spray impingement method to quantify rate of injection, the experimental setup and equipment selections vary widely and may contribute to disagreements in measured rate of injection. This paper identifies and provides estimates of measurement uncertainties that can arise when employing different experimental setups using the impingement method. It was observed that the impingement technique was sensitive to the design of the strike cap, specifically the contact area between the cap and transducer diaphragm, in addition to fuel temperature. Conversely, we observed that the impingement technique was relatively insensitive to angular and vertical misalignment, where the uncertainty can be estimated using control volume analysis. Transducer selection, specifically those with low acceleration sensitivity, high resonant frequency, and integrated electronics piezoelectric circuitry, substantially reduces the noise in the measurement.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 2016
Research-Article
Diesel Spray Rate-of-Momentum Measurement Uncertainties and Diagnostic Considerations
Benjamin W. Knox,
Benjamin W. Knox
G. W. Woodruff School of
Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332
e-mail: bknox3@gatech.edu
Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332
e-mail: bknox3@gatech.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael J. Franze,
Michael J. Franze
G. W. Woodruff School of
Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332
e-mail: mfranze3@gatech.edu
Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332
e-mail: mfranze3@gatech.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Caroline L. Genzale
Caroline L. Genzale
G. W. Woodruff School of
Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332
e-mail: caroline.genzale@me.gatech.edu
Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332
e-mail: caroline.genzale@me.gatech.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Benjamin W. Knox
G. W. Woodruff School of
Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332
e-mail: bknox3@gatech.edu
Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332
e-mail: bknox3@gatech.edu
Michael J. Franze
G. W. Woodruff School of
Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332
e-mail: mfranze3@gatech.edu
Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332
e-mail: mfranze3@gatech.edu
Caroline L. Genzale
G. W. Woodruff School of
Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332
e-mail: caroline.genzale@me.gatech.edu
Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332
e-mail: caroline.genzale@me.gatech.edu
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Combustion and Fuels Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received June 18, 2015; final manuscript received August 5, 2015; published online September 29, 2015. Editor: David Wisler.
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. Mar 2016, 138(3): 031507 (9 pages)
Published Online: September 29, 2015
Article history
Received:
June 18, 2015
Revised:
August 5, 2015
Citation
Knox, B. W., Franze, M. J., and Genzale, C. L. (September 29, 2015). "Diesel Spray Rate-of-Momentum Measurement Uncertainties and Diagnostic Considerations." ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. March 2016; 138(3): 031507. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031432
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Investigating the Mixture Quality in Multi-Injector Burner Systems, Part II: Model Application
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Gldan: Global and Local Domain Adaptation Network for Cross-Wind Turbine Fault Diagnosis
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Related Articles
A Comparison of Single and Multiphase Jets in a Crossflow Using Large Eddy Simulations
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (January,2007)
Turbulent Transient Gas Injections
J. Fluids Eng (December,2000)
Understanding the Acoustic Oscillations Observed in the Injection Rate of a Common-Rail Direct Injection Diesel Injector
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (December,2012)
Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of the Effect of Water Injection Characteristics on TSCI: A New, Load-Flexible, Advanced Combustion Concept
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (November,2018)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Antilock-Braking System Using Fuzzy Logic
International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Technology, 3rd, (ICMET-China 2011), Volumes 1–3
Internal and Near Nozzle Flow Simulations of Gasoline Multi-Hole Injector (ECN Spray G) with Transient Needle Motion
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)
In-Nozzle Cavitation-Induced Orifice-to-Orifice Variations Using Real Injector Geometry and Gasoline-Like Fuels
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Cavitation (CAV2018)