The design process for heat exchangers in the process industries and for similar applications in the power and large-scale environmental control industries is described. Because of the variety of substances (frequently multicomponent, of variable and uncertain composition, and changing phase) to be processed under wide ranges of temperatures, pressures, flow rates, chemical compatibility, and fouling propensity, these exchangers are almost always custom-designed and constructed. Many different exchanger configurations are commercially available to meet special conditions, with design procedures of varying degrees of reliability. A general design logic can be applied, with detailed procedures specific to the type of exchanger. The basis of the design process is first a careful and comprehensive specification of the range of conditions to be satisfied, and second, organized use of a fundamentally valid and extrapolatable rating method. The emphasis in choosing a design method is upon rational representation of the physical processes, rather than upon high accuracy. Finally, the resultant design must be vetted in detail by the designer and the process engineer for operability, flexibility, maintainability, and safety.

1.
Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association, Inc., 1999, Standards, 8th ed., Tarrytown, New York.
2.
Bell, K. J., 1970, Process Heat Transfer Class Notes, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma.
3.
Heat Exchanger Design Handbook-1998, (HEDH-1998), 1998, G. F. Hewitt, ed., Begell House, New York.
4.
Tinker, T., 1951, “Shell Side Characteristics of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers, Parts I, II, III,” Proceedings of the General Discussion on Heat Transfer, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, London, pp. 89–116.
5.
Palen, J. W., and Taborek, J., 1969, “Solution of Shell Side Flow Pressure Drop and Heat Transfer by Stream Analysis Method,” CEP Symp. Ser., 65(92), Heat Transfer—Philadelphia, pp. 53–63.
6.
Bell
,
K. J.
, and
Bergelin
,
O. P.
,
1957
, “
Flow Through Annular Orifices
,”
Trans. ASME
,
79
, pp.
593
603
.
7.
Bergelin, O. P., Colburn, A. P., and Hull, H. L., 1950, “Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop During Viscous Flow Across Unbaffled Tube Banks,” Bulletin No. 2, University of Delaware Engineering Experiment Station, Newark, Delaware.
8.
Bergelin, O. P., Leighton, M. D., Lafferty, W. L., Jr., and Pigford, R. L., 1958, “Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop During Viscous and Turbulent Flow Across Baffled and Unbaffled Tube Banks,” Bulletin No. 4, University of Delaware Engineering Experiment Station, Newark, Delaware.
9.
Bell, K. J., 1963, “Final Report of the Cooperative Research Program on Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers,” Bulletin No. 5, University of Delaware Engineering Experimental Station, Newark, Delaware.
10.
Bell
,
K. J.
,
1960
, “
Exchanger Design—Based on the Delaware Research Program
,”
Petro/Chem Engineer
, October
, pp.
C-26–C-40c
C-26–C-40c
.
11.
Prithiviraj
,
M.
, and
Andrews
,
M. J.
,
1999
, “
Comparison of a Three-Dimensional Numerical Model With Existing Methods for Prediction of Flow in Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers
,”
Heat Transfer Eng.
,
20
(
2
), pp.
15
19
.
12.
Kistler, S., 2004 (personal communication).
13.
Lubicic, B., 2004 (personal communication).
14.
Kral
,
D.
,
Stehlik
,
P.
,
Van Der Ploeg
,
H. J.
, and
Master
,
B. I.
,
1996
, “
Helical Baffles in Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers, Part I: Experimental Verification
,”
Heat Transfer Eng.
,
17
(
1
), pp.
93
101
.
15.
Taborek, J., 2004, “Pressure Drop to Heat Transfer Conversion in Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers With Disc-and-Donut Baffles,” paper presented at AICHE Spring Meeting, 2004, New Orleans, LA.
16.
Nesta, J., and Bennett, C. A., 2004, “Mitigation of Fouling in Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers” (unpublished).
17.
Bott, T. R., 1995, Fouling of Heat Exchangers, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
You do not currently have access to this content.