Springback is an important issue for the application of advanced high-strength steels (AHSS) in the automobile industry. Various studies have shown that it is an effective way to predict springback by using path-dependent material models. The accuracy of these material models greatly depends on the experimental test methods as well as material parameters calibrated from these tests. The present cyclic sheet metal test methods, like uniaxial tension–compression test (TCT) and cyclic shear test (CST), are nonstandard and various. The material parameters calibrated from these tests vary greatly from one to another, which makes the usage of material parameters for the accurate prediction of springback more sophisticated even when the advanced material model is available in commercial software. The focus of this work is to compare the springback prediction accuracy by using the material parameters calibrated from tension–compression test or cyclic shear test, and to further clarify the usage of those material parameters in application. These two types of nonstandard cyclic tests are successfully carried out on a same test platform with different specimen geometries. One-element models with corresponding tension–compression or cyclic shear boundary conditions are built, respectively, to calibrate the parameters of the modified Yoshida–Uemori (YU) model for these two different tests. U-bending process is performed for springback prediction comparison. The results show, for dual phase steel (DP780), the work hardening stagnation is not evident by tension–compression tests at all the prestrain levels or by cyclic shear test at small prestrain γ = 0.20 but is significantly apparent by cyclic shear tests at large prestrain γ = 0.38, 0.52, 0.68, which seems to be a prestrain-dependent phenomenon. The material parameters calibrated from different types of cyclic sheet metal tests can vary greatly, but it gives slight differences of springback prediction for U-bending by utilizing either tension–compression test or cyclic shear test.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
September 2017
Research-Article
Cyclic Sheet Metal Test Comparison and Parameter Calibration for Springback Prediction of Dual-Phase Steel Sheets
Bin Gu,
Bin Gu
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical
System and Vibration,
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital
Manufacture for Thin-walled Structures,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
System and Vibration,
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital
Manufacture for Thin-walled Structures,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Ji He,
Ji He
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical
System and Vibration,
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital
Manufacture for Thin-walled Structures,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: benbenhj@sjtu.edu.cn
System and Vibration,
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital
Manufacture for Thin-walled Structures,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: benbenhj@sjtu.edu.cn
Search for other works by this author on:
Shuhui Li,
Shuhui Li
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical
System and Vibration,
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital
Manufacture for Thin-walled Structures,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: lishuhui@sjtu.edu.cn
System and Vibration,
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital
Manufacture for Thin-walled Structures,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: lishuhui@sjtu.edu.cn
Search for other works by this author on:
Yuan Chen,
Yuan Chen
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical
System and Vibration,
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital
Manufacture for Thin-walled Structures,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
System and Vibration,
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital
Manufacture for Thin-walled Structures,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Yongfeng Li
Yongfeng Li
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical
System and Vibration,
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital
Manufacture for Thin-walled Structures,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
System and Vibration,
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital
Manufacture for Thin-walled Structures,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
Search for other works by this author on:
Bin Gu
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical
System and Vibration,
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital
Manufacture for Thin-walled Structures,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
System and Vibration,
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital
Manufacture for Thin-walled Structures,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
Ji He
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical
System and Vibration,
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital
Manufacture for Thin-walled Structures,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: benbenhj@sjtu.edu.cn
System and Vibration,
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital
Manufacture for Thin-walled Structures,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: benbenhj@sjtu.edu.cn
Shuhui Li
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical
System and Vibration,
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital
Manufacture for Thin-walled Structures,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: lishuhui@sjtu.edu.cn
System and Vibration,
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital
Manufacture for Thin-walled Structures,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
e-mail: lishuhui@sjtu.edu.cn
Yuan Chen
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical
System and Vibration,
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital
Manufacture for Thin-walled Structures,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
System and Vibration,
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital
Manufacture for Thin-walled Structures,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
Yongfeng Li
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical
System and Vibration,
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital
Manufacture for Thin-walled Structures,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
System and Vibration,
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital
Manufacture for Thin-walled Structures,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China
1Corresponding authors.
Manuscript received March 14, 2017; final manuscript received May 29, 2017; published online July 14, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Gracious Ngaile.
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Sep 2017, 139(9): 091010 (14 pages)
Published Online: July 14, 2017
Article history
Received:
March 14, 2017
Revised:
May 29, 2017
Citation
Gu, B., He, J., Li, S., Chen, Y., and Li, Y. (July 14, 2017). "Cyclic Sheet Metal Test Comparison and Parameter Calibration for Springback Prediction of Dual-Phase Steel Sheets." ASME. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. September 2017; 139(9): 091010. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037040
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Effect of Laser Forming on the Fatigue Behavior of Metal Foams
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (September 2022)
Characterization and Analysis of the Thermal Conductivity of AlSi10Mg Fabricated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (October 2022)
A Novel Asymmetric Face Gear Cut by Duplex Face-Milling With Multiple Auxiliary Flank Modification Motions
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (October 2022)
Effects of Material Properties on Micro-Scale Cutting of TA15 Alloy and Network-Structured TiBw/TA15 Composites
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (October 2022)
Related Articles
Application of Gotoh's Orthotropic Yield Function for Modeling Advanced High-Strength Steel Sheets
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (September,2016)
On the Parameter Identification of Polynomial Anisotropic Yield Functions
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (July,2016)
A Review of Electrically-Assisted Manufacturing With Emphasis on Modeling and Understanding of the Electroplastic Effect
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (November,2017)
Prediction of Process Forces in Fiber Metal Laminate Stamping
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng (March,2018)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Clamping, Interference, Microslip, and Self-Piercing Rivets
Structural Shear Joints: Analyses, Properties and Design for Repeat Loading
Basic Concepts
Design & Analysis of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Components in the Creep Range
Fatigue Analysis in the Connecting Rod of MF285 Tractor by Finite Element Method
International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering, 4th (ICACTE 2011)