It was observed in an earlier work by Morimoto et al. [Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. No. 70, Oxford 1984, p. 427] that the dynamic compact of an aluminium powder medium had greater flakiness and contiguity ratio than the static compact of the same density. This observed difference in micro structure is used to explain their result that the dynamic pressure of the medium is higher than the static pressure for a given density: the degree of rotation of particles during compaction is assumed to decrease for higher strain rates, because of the shorter time available, causing an increase in plastic particle deformation in the compaction direction, and increased resistance to the compaction. The normal Hugoniot equation derived, in which the mean strain rate averaged over a single steady wavefront is introduced, indicates that a rise of the normal Hugoniot with an increase in the strain rate results macroscopically from the increase in the propagation velocity of the wavefront. The multiwave Hugoniot equation is found to depend on the strain rate history of a given material. In compactions of a metal powder medium by punch impact, the wavefronts passing through the medium are approximately steady if the punch mass is sufficiently larger than the medium mass. But both the number of wavefronts arising during the compaction and the amplitudes of the strain waves, and hence the strain rate histories, vary with compaction conditions such as punch mass and initial punch velocity. This implies that a dynamic equilibrium constitutive relation for the medium will depend on the compaction conditions, and therefore cannot be determined uniquely for any two compactions.

1.
Wang, S., and Davies, R., “Some Effects of High Speeds in Metal Powder Compaction,” Proceedings 9th Machine Tool Design and Research Conf., Birmingham, 1968, p. 168.
2.
Elwakil, S., and Davies, R., “High-Speed Compaction of Metal Powders,” Proceedings 13th Machine Tool Design and Research Conf., Birmingham, 1972, p. 435.
3.
Clyens
S.
, and
Johnson
W.
, “
The Dynamic Compaction of Powdered Materials
,”
Mater. Sci. Eng.
, Vol.
30
,
1977
, p.
121
121
.
4.
Sano
Y.
, “
Dynamic Compaction of Metal Powder
,” (in Japanese),
J. Japan Soc. Tech. Plasticity
, Vol.
18
,
1977
, p.
250
250
.
5.
Oyane
M.
,
Taketsuna
Y.
, and
Nishihara
N.
, “
Powder Compaction and Extrusion under High Speed and High Pressure
,” (in Japanese),
J. Japan Soc. Powder and Powder Met.
, Vol.
15
,
1968
, p.
245
245
.
6.
Sano
Y.
, “
One-Dimensional Density Distributions of Powder Media in Dies Subjected to Multishock Compactions
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY
, Vol.
110
,
1988
, p.
355
355
.
7.
Vityaz, A., and Roman, O. V., “Impulse Compacting of Powder Materials,” Proceedings 13th Machine Tool Design and Research Conf., Birmingham, 1972, p. 441.
8.
Morimoto, Y., Hayashi, T., and Nakanishi, A., “Mechanical Process of Dynamic Powder Compaction,” Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. No. 70, Oxford 1984, p. 427.
9.
Bockstiegel
G.
, “
Relations Between Pore Structure and Densification Mechanism in the Compacting of Iron Powders
,”
International Journal of Powder Metallurgy
, Vol.
2
, No.
4
,
1966
, p.
14
14
.
10.
Kaufman
S. M.
, “
The Role of Pore Size in the Ultimate Densification Achievable During P/M Forging
,”
International Journal of Powder Metallurgy
, Vol.
8
, No.
4
,
1972
, p.
183
183
.
11.
Rusnak
R. M.
, “
Energy Relationships in the High Velocity Compaction of Powder
,”
The International Journal of Powder Metallurgy & Powder Technology
, Vol.
12
, No.
2
,
1976
, p.
91
91
.
12.
Fischmeister
H. F.
, Powder Metallurgical Peview 9 “
Characterization of Porous Structure by Stereological Measurements
,”
Powder Metallurgy Int.
, Vol.
7
, No.
4
,
1975
, p.
178
178
.
13.
Mitkov, M., Exner, H. E., and Petzow, G., “Orientation of Pore Structure in Loose and Pressed Carbonyl Iron and its Influence on Shrinkage Anisotropy,” Int. Round Table Conf. on Sintering, Vol. 4, No. 79, 1977, p. 90.
14.
Fischmeister
H. F.
,
Arzt
E.
, and
Olsson
L. R.
, “
Particle Deformation and Sliding During Compaction of Spherical Powders; A Study by Quantitative Metallography
,”
Powder Metallurgy
, Vol.
21
, No.
4
,
1978
, p.
179
179
.
15.
Missiaen, J. M., and Thomas, G., “The Miles Method for the Determination of Particle Size Distribution by Automatic Image Analysis,” Vol. 57, 1989, p. 165.
16.
Dan, K., Tamura, H., Sawaoka, A., Mori, T., Hwang, M., and Horie, Y., “Microstructure of Single Crystal Copper Rods Shock Treated by a Rod-in-cylinder Technique,” Shock Compression of Condensed Matter 1993, to be published.
17.
Dan
K.
,
Tamura
H.
,
Sawaoka
A.
,
Mori
T.
,
Hwang
M.
, and
Horie
Y.
, “
Unique Fine Microstructures of Iron Caused by Intense Shearing under Shock Compression
,”
Japan J. Appl. Phys.
, Vol.
33
,
1994
, p.
2667
2667
.
18.
Sano
Y.
, “
Underdetermined system theory applied to qualitative analysis of response caused by attenuating plane waves
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
, Vol.
65
,
1989
, p.
3857
3857
.
19.
Davison
L.
, “
Shock-Wave Structure in Porous Solids
,”
J. Appl. Phys.
, Vol.
42
,
1971
, p.
5503
5503
.
20.
Sano
Y.
,
Miyagi
K.
, and
Tokushima
K.
, “
Dynamic Equilibrium Constitutive Relations of Copper Powder Within Dies Subjected to Multiple Shock Compactions
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY
, Vol.
111
,
1989
, p.
183
183
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.