Foam damping materials judiciously placed in automotive structures efficiently reduce the vibration amplitudes of large, relatively flat exterior body panels such as the hood, roof, deck lid (trunk) and door skin. These polymer foams (typically epoxy or vinyl) have mechanical properties that depend on the foam homogeneity, degree of expansion, temperature and frequency of excitation. Standard methods for determining true bulk mechanical properties, such as Young’s modulus, shear modulus and damping terms, are discussed along with methods for determining engineering estimates of the properties “as used” in automotive applications. Characterizing these foam damping materials in a component or full body finite element structural model as discrete springs and dashpots provides an accurate and economical means to include these features. Example analyses of the free vibrations and forced response of a hood are presented accompanied by test data that demonstrate the accuracy of the structural model. A parametric study investigates the effect of foam material stiffness and damping properties on hood vibration amplitudes under dynamic air loading. A methodology is discussed to reduce the hood vibration level under cross-wind conditions to an acceptable level with the use of foam materials.

1.
Adams, D. S., 1996, “Efficient Finite Element Modeling of Thin-Walled Structures with Constrained Viscoelastic Damping,” AIAA-96-1651-CP, AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS Structures, Structural Dynamics &Materials Conference, Proceedings of the 1996 37th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Part 4, pp. 2079–2085, Salt Lake City, UT.
2.
Aklonis, J. J., and MacKnight, W. J., 1983, Introduction to Polymer Viscoelas-ticity, Wiley-Interscience, New York.
3.
Do̸ssing, O., 1987, Structural Testing, Part 1: Mechanical Mobility Measurements, Bru¨el & Kjær Inc. Publications, Nærum, Denmark.
4.
Clough R. W., and Penzien, J., 1975, Dynamics of Structures, McGraw-Hill, New York.
5.
Findley, W. N., Lai, J. S., and Onaran, K., 1976, Creep and Relaxation of Nonlinear Viscoelastic Materials, Dover Publications, New York.
6.
Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc., 1995, ABAQUS/Standard User’s Manual, Version 5.5, Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc., Pawtucket, RI.
7.
Kosmatka
J. B.
, and
Ligore
S. L.
,
1993
, “
Review of Methods for Analyzing Constrained-Layer Damped Structures
,”
ASCE, Journal of Aerospace Engineering
, Vol.
6
, No.
3
, pp.
268
283
.
8.
Nielsen, L. E., 1974, Mechanical Properties of Polymers and Composites, Vol. 1, Chapter 4, Marcel Dekker, New York.
9.
Reymond, M., and Miller, M., 1994, MSC/NASTRAN Quick REFERENCE Guide, Version 68, The MacNeal-Schwendler Corp., Los Angeles, CA.
10.
Saravanos
D. A.
, and
Chamis
C. C.
,
1991
, “
Computational Simulation of Damping in Composite Structures
,”
Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites
, Vol.
10
, No.
3
, pp.
256
278
.
11.
Sun, C. T., and Lu, Y. P., 1995, Vibration Damping of Structural Elements, Prentice Hall PTR, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
12.
Timoshenko, S. P., and Gere, G. M., 1972, Mechanics of Materials, van Nostrand, New York.
13.
Wagner, D. A., 1996, “FEA (Finite Element Analysis) Modeling for Body-In-White Adhesives,” SAE Paper #960784, SAE International Conference and Exposition, Feb. 26–29, 1996, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA.
14.
Ward, I. M., 1983, Mechanical Properties of Solid Polymers, 2nd Edition, Wiley-Interscience, New York.
15.
Ward, S. M., Samus, M. A., and Westerbeek, G. L., 1996, “Methods for Measuring Mechanical Properties of Adhesives and Sealers for Use in Finite Element Analysis Modelling,” SAE Paper #960785, SAE International Conference and Exposition, February 26–29, 1996, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.