The hot deformation behavior of four different steels in the as-cast condition was investigated by means of hot compression tests conducted at temperatures ranging from 1100 °C up to 1200 °C, and at strain rates in between 0.12 and 2.4 s−1. The primary focus of this work was to check the possibility to increase the strain rate during the rough preliminary working of the ingots, i.e., to adopt a rough rolling process in place of the more conventional rough forging. The second aim of the research was to study the influence of the different characteristics of these steels in their as-cast conditions on their hot deformation behavior. It was seen that in all deformation conditions, the stress–strain compression curves show a single peak, indicating the occurrence of dynamic recrystallization (DRX). The hot deformation behavior was studied in both the condition of dynamic recovery (DRV), modeling the stress–strain curves in the initial stage of deformation, and DRX. Data of modeling were satisfactorily employed to estimate the flow stress under different conditions of temperature and strain rate. The experimental values of the activation energy for hot deformation, QHW, were determined and correlated to the chemical composition of the steels; a power law curve was found to describe the relation of QHW and the total amount of substitutional elements of the steels. The critical strain for DRX, εc, was determined as a function of the Zener–Hollomon parameter and correlated to the peak strain, εp. A ratio εc/εp in the range 0.45–0.65 was found, which is in agreement with literature data. All this information is crucial for a correct design of the rough deformation process of the produced ingots.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
April 2018
Research-Article
Hot Deformation Behavior of Four Steels: A Comparative Study
C. Menapace,
C. Menapace
Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Trento,
via Sommarive 9,
Trento 38123, Italy
e-mail: cinzia.menapace@unitn.it
University of Trento,
via Sommarive 9,
Trento 38123, Italy
e-mail: cinzia.menapace@unitn.it
Search for other works by this author on:
N. Sartori,
N. Sartori
Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Trento,
Trento 38123, Italy
e-mail: n.sartori@danieli.it
University of Trento,
via Sommarive 9
,Trento 38123, Italy
e-mail: n.sartori@danieli.it
Search for other works by this author on:
M. Pellizzari,
M. Pellizzari
Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Trento,
Trento 38123, Italy
University of Trento,
via Sommarive 9
,Trento 38123, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
G. Straffelini
G. Straffelini
Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Trento,
Trento 38123, Italy
University of Trento,
via Sommarive 9
,Trento 38123, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
C. Menapace
Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Trento,
via Sommarive 9,
Trento 38123, Italy
e-mail: cinzia.menapace@unitn.it
University of Trento,
via Sommarive 9,
Trento 38123, Italy
e-mail: cinzia.menapace@unitn.it
N. Sartori
Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Trento,
Trento 38123, Italy
e-mail: n.sartori@danieli.it
University of Trento,
via Sommarive 9
,Trento 38123, Italy
e-mail: n.sartori@danieli.it
M. Pellizzari
Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Trento,
Trento 38123, Italy
University of Trento,
via Sommarive 9
,Trento 38123, Italy
G. Straffelini
Department of Industrial Engineering,
University of Trento,
Trento 38123, Italy
University of Trento,
via Sommarive 9
,Trento 38123, Italy
1Present address: Danieli & C Spa, via Nazionale 41, Buttrio 33042, Udine, Italy.
Contributed by the Materials Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received September 14, 2016; final manuscript received September 18, 2017; published online January 19, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Ashraf Bastawros.
J. Eng. Mater. Technol. Apr 2018, 140(2): 021006 (11 pages)
Published Online: January 19, 2018
Article history
Received:
September 14, 2016
Revised:
September 18, 2017
Citation
Menapace, C., Sartori, N., Pellizzari, M., and Straffelini, G. (January 19, 2018). "Hot Deformation Behavior of Four Steels: A Comparative Study." ASME. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. April 2018; 140(2): 021006. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038670
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for Predicting the Hot Deformation Flow Stress of Sintered Al–Zn–Mg Alloy
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (April 2025)
Blast Mitigation Using Monolithic Closed-Cell Aluminum Foam
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (April 2025)
Irradiation Damage Evolution Dependence on Misorientation Angle for Σ 5 Grain Boundary of Nb: An Atomistic Simulation-Based Study
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (July 2025)
Related Articles
Prediction of Stress–Strain Curves of Metastable Austenitic Stainless Steel Considering Deformation-Induced Martensitic Transformation
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (July,2017)
Smooth Yield Surface Constitutive Modeling for Granular Materials
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (January,2017)
High Temperature Flow Behavior and Microstructure of Al-Cu/Mg 2 Si Metal Matrix Composite
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (April,2015)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Microstructure Evolution and Physics-Based Modeling
Ultrasonic Welding of Lithium-Ion Batteries
Introduction to Stress and Deformation
Introduction to Plastics Engineering
Analysis of Components: Strain- and Deformation-Controlled Limits
Design & Analysis of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Components in the Creep Range