In the design of wind turbines—onshore or offshore—the prediction of extreme loads associated with a target return period requires statistical extrapolation from available loads data. The data required for such extrapolation are obtained by stochastic time-domain simulation of the inflow turbulence, the incident waves, and the turbine response. Prediction of accurate loads depends on assumptions made in the simulation models employed. While for the wind, inflow turbulence models are relatively well established; for wave input, the current practice is to model irregular (random) waves using a linear wave theory. Such a wave model does not adequately represent waves in shallow waters where most offshore wind turbines are being sited. As an alternative to this less realistic wave model, the present study investigates the use of irregular nonlinear (second-order) waves for estimating loads on an offshore wind turbine with a focus on the fore-aft tower bending moment at the mudline. We use a 5 MW utility-scale wind turbine model for the simulations. Using, first, simpler linear irregular wave modeling assumptions, we establish long-term loads and identify governing environmental conditions (i.e., the wind speed and wave height) that are associated with the 20-year return period load derived using the inverse first-order reliability method. We present the nonlinear irregular wave model next and incorporate it into an integrated wind-wave response simulation analysis program for offshore wind turbines. We compute turbine loads for the governing environmental conditions identified with the linear model and also for an extreme environmental state. We show that computed loads are generally larger with the nonlinear wave modeling assumptions; this establishes the importance of using such refined nonlinear wave models in stochastic simulation of the response of offshore wind turbines.

1.
Sharma
,
J. N.
, and
Dean
,
R. G.
, 1979, “
Development and Evaluation of a Procedure for Simulating a Random Directional Second-Order Sea Surface and Associated Wave Forces
,” University of Delaware, Ocean Engineering Technical Report No. 20.
2.
International Electrotechnical Commission
, 2005, “
Wind Turbines—Part 3: Design Requirements for Offshore Wind Turbines
,” IEC-61400-3, TC88 WG3 Committee Draft.
3.
Saranyasoontorn
,
K.
, and
Manuel
,
L.
, 2006, “
Design Loads for Wind Turbines Using the Environmental Contour Method
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
0199-6231,
128
(
4
), pp.
554
561
.
4.
Jonkman
,
J. M.
,
Butterfield
,
S.
,
Musial
,
W.
, and
Scott
,
G.
, 2007, “
Definition of a 5-MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Technical Report No. NREL/TP-500-38060.
5.
Jonkman
,
J. M.
, and
Buhl
,
M. L.
, Jr.
, 2005, “
FAST User’s Guide
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Technical Report No. NREL/EL-500-38230.
6.
Agarwal
,
P.
, and
Manuel
,
L.
, 2007, “
Simulation of Offshore Wind Turbine Response for Extreme Limit States
,”
26th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, OMAE2007
.
7.
Winterstein
,
S. R.
,
Ude
,
T. C.
,
Cornell
,
C. A.
,
Bjerager
,
P.
, and
Haver
,
S.
, 1993, “
Environmental Contours for Extreme Response: Inverse FORM With Omission Factors
,”
Proceedings of ICOSSAR-93
.
8.
Bush
,
E.
, and
Manuel
,
L.
, 2009, “
Foundation Models for Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
ASME Wind Energy Symposium, AIAA
.
9.
Jonkman
,
B. J.
, and
Buhl
,
M. L.
, Jr.
, 2007, “
TURBSIM User’s Guide
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Technical Report No. NREL/TP-500-41136.
10.
Det Norske Veritas, 2007, “
Design of Offshore Wind Turbine Structures, Offshore Standard
,” DNV-OS-J101.
11.
Barltrop
,
N.
, and
Adams
,
A.
, 1991,
Dynamics of Fixed Marine Structures
,
Butterworth
,
London
.
12.
Hu
,
S. -L. J.
, and
Zhao
,
D.
, 1993, “
Non-Gaussian Properties of Second-Order Random Waves
,”
J. Eng. Mech.
0733-9399,
119
(
2
), pp.
344
364
.
13.
Jha
,
A. K.
, 1997, “
Nonlinear Stochastic Models for Ocean Wave Loads and Responses of Offshore Structures and Vessels
,” Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, Standford, CA.
14.
Forristall
,
G. Z.
, 2000, “
Wave Crest Distributions: Observations and Second-Order Theory
,”
J. Phys. Oceanogr.
1520-0485,
30
(
8
), pp.
1931
1943
.
15.
Song
,
J. -B.
, and
Wu
,
Y. -H.
, 2000, “
Statistical Distribution of Water-Particle Velocity Below the Surface Layer for Finite Water Depth
,”
Coast. Eng.
,
40
, pp.
1
19
. 0378-3839
16.
Det Norske Veritas, 2007, “
Environmental Conditions and Environmental Loads, Recommended Practice
,” DNV-RP-C205.
17.
ITTC
, 1999, “
The Specialist Committee on Environmental Modeling, Final Report and Recommendations to the 22nd ITTC
,” International Towing Tank Conference, Seoul, Korea.
18.
Agarwal
,
P.
, and
Manuel
,
L.
, 2008, “
Wave Models for Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
ASME Wind Energy Symposium, AIAA
.
19.
Sharma
,
J. N.
, and
Dean
,
R. G.
, 2007, “
Contributions to Second Order Directional Sea Simulation and Wave Forces
,”
26th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, OMAE2007
.
20.
Langley
,
R.
, 1987, “
A Statistical Analysis of Nonlinear Random Waves
,”
Ocean Eng.
0029-8018,
14
(
5
), pp.
389
407
.
21.
Madsen
,
H. O.
,
Krenk
,
S.
, and
Lind
,
N. C.
, 1986,
Methods of Structural Safety
,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
.
22.
Jonkman
,
J.
,
Butterfield
,
S. P.
,
Passon
,
P.
,
Larsen
,
T.
,
Camp
,
T.
,
Nichols
,
J.
,
Azcona
,
J.
, and
Martinez
,
A.
, 2008, “
Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration Within IEA Wind Annex XXIII: Phase II Results Regarding Monopile Foundation Modeling
,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Technical Report No. NREL/CP-500-42471.
23.
van der Tempel
,
J.
, and
Molenaar
,
D. -P.
, 2002, “
Wind Turbine Structural Dynamics—A Review of the Principles for Modern Power Generation, Onshore and Offshore
,”
Wind Eng.
0309-524X,
26
(
4
), pp.
211
220
.
24.
Tarp-Johansen
,
N. J.
, and
Frandsen
,
S.
, 1999, “
A Simple Model for Offshore Wind Turbine Foundation Design
,” Riso National Laboratory.
You do not currently have access to this content.