1-20 of 20798
Save search
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Articles

American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons

Albert Ku, Mark Richmond
Journal: Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Article Type: Research Papers
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. August 2023, 145(4): 041703.
Paper No: OMAE-22-1107
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4056620
Published Online: January 27, 2023
View Article
PDF
Topics: American Petroleum Institute, Hydrostatics, Hydrostatic pressure, Tension
Image
Group 1 test versus capacity curves (without resistance factors), intermedi...

Group 1 test versus capacity curves (without resistance factors), intermedi...

in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons > Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 1 Group 1 test versus capacity curves (without resistance factors), intermediate hydrostatic pressure H = 0.54 More
Image
Group 1 test versus capacity curves (without resistance factors), high hydr...

Group 1 test versus capacity curves (without resistance factors), high hydr...

in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons > Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 2 Group 1 test versus capacity curves (without resistance factors), high hydrostatic pressure H = 0.85 More
Image
Group 1 test versus capacity curves (with resistance factors), intermediate...

Group 1 test versus capacity curves (with resistance factors), intermediate...

in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons > Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 3 Group 1 test versus capacity curves (with resistance factors), intermediate hydrostatic pressure H = 0.54 More
Image
Group 1 test versus capacity curves (with resistance factors), high hydrost...

Group 1 test versus capacity curves (with resistance factors), high hydrost...

in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons > Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 4 Group 1 test versus capacity curves (with resistance factors), high hydrostatic pressure H = 0.85 More
Image
Group 1 UC checks, ISO 19902:2020

Group 1 UC checks, ISO 19902:2020

in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons > Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 5 Group 1 UC checks, ISO 19902:2020 More
Image
Group 1 UC checks, API RP2A-LRFD:2019

Group 1 UC checks, API RP2A-LRFD:2019

in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons > Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 6 Group 1 UC checks, API RP2A-LRFD:2019 More
Image
Group 1 UC checks, Chen et al.

Group 1 UC checks, Chen et al.

in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons > Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 7 Group 1 UC checks, Chen et al. More
Image
Group 1 controlling UC comparisons

Group 1 controlling UC comparisons

in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons > Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 8 Group 1 controlling UC comparisons More
Image
Group 1 tests versus capacity curves (without resistance factors), intermed...

Group 1 tests versus capacity curves (without resistance factors), intermed...

in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons > Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 9 Group 1 tests versus capacity curves (without resistance factors), intermediate hydrostatic pressure ( H = 0.47) More
Image
Group 1 tests versus capacity curves (without resistance factors), high hyd...

Group 1 tests versus capacity curves (without resistance factors), high hyd...

in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons > Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 10 Group 1 tests versus capacity curves (without resistance factors), high hydrostatic pressure ( H = 0.95) More
Image
Group 1 UC checks according to ISO 19902:2020 (high axial case)

Group 1 UC checks according to ISO 19902:2020 (high axial case)

in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons > Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 11 Group 1 UC checks according to ISO 19902:2020 (high axial case) More
Image
Group 1 UC checks according to API RP2A (high axial case)

Group 1 UC checks according to API RP2A (high axial case)

in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons > Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 12 Group 1 UC checks according to API RP2A (high axial case) More
Image
Group 1 UC checks according to Chen et al. (high axial case)

Group 1 UC checks according to Chen et al. (high axial case)

in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons > Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 13 Group 1 UC checks according to Chen et al. (high axial case) More
Image
Group 1 controlling UC comparisons (high axial case)

Group 1 controlling UC comparisons (high axial case)

in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons > Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 14 Group 1 controlling UC comparisons (high axial case) More
Image
Hoop and tension interaction, test [ 4 ] versus API and ISO equations

Hoop and tension interaction, test [ 4 ] versus API and ISO equations

in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons > Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 15 Hoop and tension interaction, test [ 4 ] versus API and ISO equations More
Image
Test [ 10 ] versus API and ISO equations

Test [ 10 ] versus API and ISO equations

in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons > Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 16 Test [ 10 ] versus API and ISO equations More
Image
Hydrostatic tension capacity equations ( H = 0.45)

Hydrostatic tension capacity equations ( H = 0.45)

in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons > Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 17 Hydrostatic tension capacity equations ( H = 0.45) More
Image
UC checks according to ISO 19902:2020

UC checks according to ISO 19902:2020

in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons > Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 18 UC checks according to ISO 19902:2020 More
Image
UC checks according to API RP-2A LRFD (2019)

UC checks according to API RP-2A LRFD (2019)

in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons > Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 19 UC checks according to API RP-2A LRFD (2019) More