Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Journal Volume Number
- References
- Conference Volume Title
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Journal Volume Number
- References
- Conference Volume Title
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Journal Volume Number
- References
- Conference Volume Title
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Journal Volume Number
- References
- Conference Volume Title
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Journal Volume Number
- References
- Conference Volume Title
- Paper No
Filter
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- ISBN-10
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Journal Volume Number
- References
- Conference Volume Title
- Paper No
NARROW
Date
Availability
1-20 of 20798
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Journal Articles
Article Type: Research Papers
J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. August 2023, 145(4): 041703.
Paper No: OMAE-22-1107
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Image
in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons
> Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 1 Group 1 test versus capacity curves (without resistance factors), intermediate hydrostatic pressure H = 0.54 More
Image
in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons
> Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 2 Group 1 test versus capacity curves (without resistance factors), high hydrostatic pressure H = 0.85 More
Image
in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons
> Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 3 Group 1 test versus capacity curves (with resistance factors), intermediate hydrostatic pressure H = 0.54 More
Image
in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons
> Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 4 Group 1 test versus capacity curves (with resistance factors), high hydrostatic pressure H = 0.85 More
Image
in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons
> Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 5 Group 1 UC checks, ISO 19902:2020 More
Image
in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons
> Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 6 Group 1 UC checks, API RP2A-LRFD:2019 More
Image
in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons
> Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 7 Group 1 UC checks, Chen et al. More
Image
in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons
> Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 8 Group 1 controlling UC comparisons More
Image
in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons
> Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 9 Group 1 tests versus capacity curves (without resistance factors), intermediate hydrostatic pressure ( H = 0.47) More
Image
in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons
> Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 10 Group 1 tests versus capacity curves (without resistance factors), high hydrostatic pressure ( H = 0.95) More
Image
in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons
> Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 11 Group 1 UC checks according to ISO 19902:2020 (high axial case) More
Image
in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons
> Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 12 Group 1 UC checks according to API RP2A (high axial case) More
Image
in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons
> Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 13 Group 1 UC checks according to Chen et al. (high axial case) More
Image
in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons
> Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 14 Group 1 controlling UC comparisons (high axial case) More
Image
in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons
> Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 15 Hoop and tension interaction, test [ 4 ] versus API and ISO equations More
Image
in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons
> Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 16 Test [ 10 ] versus API and ISO equations More
Image
in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons
> Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 17 Hydrostatic tension capacity equations ( H = 0.45) More
Image
in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons
> Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 18 UC checks according to ISO 19902:2020 More
Image
in American and European Hydrostatic Tubular Beam-Column Equation Comparisons
> Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Published Online: January 27, 2023
Fig. 19 UC checks according to API RP-2A LRFD (2019) More