Two-dimensional (2D) phased arrays have the potential to significantly change the way in which engineering components in safety critical industries are inspected. In addition to enabling a three-dimensional (3D) volume of a component to be inspected from a single location, they could also be used in a C-scan configuration. The latter would enable any point in a component to be interrogated over a range of solid angles, allowing more accurate defect characterization and sizing. This paper describes the simulation and evaluation of grid, cross and circular 2D phased array element configurations. The aim of the cross and circle configurations is to increase the effective aperture for a given number of elements. Due to the multitude of possible array element configurations a model, based on Huygens’ principle, has been developed to allow analysis and comparison of candidate array designs. In addition to the element configuration, key issues such as element size, spacing, and frequency are discussed and quantitatively compared using the volume of the 3D point spread function (PSF) as a measurand. The results of this modeling indicate that, for a given number of elements, a circular array performs best and that the element spacing should be less than half a wavelength to avoid grating lobes. A prototype circular array has been built and initial results are presented. These show that a flat bottomed hole, half a wavelength in diameter, can be imaged. Furthermore, it is shown that the volume of the 3D reflection obtained experimentally from the end of the hole compares well with the volume of the 3D PSF predicted for the array at that point.

1.
Gross
,
X. E.
,
Cameron
,
N. B.
,
King
,
M.
, 2002, “
Current Applications and Future Trends in Phased Array Technology
,”
Insight
1060-135X,
44
, no.
11
, pp.
273
278
.
2.
Yen
,
J. T.
, and
Smith
,
S. W.
, 2002 “
Real Time Rectilinear Volumetric Imaging
,”
IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control
0885-3010,
49
, no.
1
, pp.
114
124
.
3.
McNab
,
A.
,
Reilly
,
D.
,
Potts
,
A.
, and
Toft
,
M.
, 2001 “
Role of 3D Graphics in NDT Data Processing
,”
IEE Proc.: Sci., Meas. Technol.
1350-2344,
148
, No.
4
, pp.
149
158
.
4.
Wooh
,
S. C.
, and
Yijun
,
S.
, 1999, “
Optimum Beam Steering of Linear Phased Arrays
,”
Wave Motion
0165-2125,
29
, pp.
245
265
.
5.
Mendelsohn
,
Y.
, and
Wiener-Avnear
,
E.
, 2002, “
Simulations of Circular 2D Phase-Array Ultrasonic Imaging Transducers
,”
Ultrasonics
0041-624X,
39
, pp.
657
666
.
6.
Cherian
,
P. M.
, and
Michael
,
D. Z.
, 1994, “
Eigenstructure Techniques for 2D Angle Estimation With Uniform Circular Arrays
,”
IEEE Trans. Signal Process.
1053-587X,
42
, no.
9
, pp.
2395
2403
.
7.
Mahaut
,
S.
,
Godefroit
,
J-L
,
Roy
,
O.
,
Cattiaux
,
G.
, 2004, “
Application of Phased Array Techniques to Coarse Grain Components Inspection
,”
Ultrasonics
0041-624X,
42
, pp.
791
796
.
8.
Daniel
,
H. T.
, and
Stuart
,
F.
, 1992, “
Fabrication and Characterization of Transducer Elements in Two-Dimensional Arrays for Medical Ultrasound Imaging
,”
IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control
0885-3010,
39
, no.
4
, pp.
464
475
.
9.
Norton
,
S. J.
, 2002, “
Synthetic Aperture Imaging With Arrays of Arbitrary Shape–Part II: The Annular Array
,”
IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control
0885-3010,
49
, no.
4
, pp.
404
408
.
10.
Holmes
,
C.
,
Drinkwater
,
B. W.
and
Wilcox
,
P. D.
, 2004, “
Post Processing of Ultrasonic Phased Array Data for Optimal Performance
,”
Insight
1060-135X,
47
, no.
2
, pp.
88
90
.
11.
Jensen
,
A. J.
and
Svendsen
N. B.
, 1992, “
Calculation of Pressure Fields From Arbitrarily Shaped, Apodized, and Excited Ultrasound Transducers
,”
IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control
0885-3010,
39
, no.
2
, pp.
262
267
.
12.
Holmes
,
C.
,
Wilcox
,
P. D.
, and
Drinkwater
,
B. W.
, 2004, “
The Post Processing of Ultrasonic Array Data Using the Total Focusing Method
,”
Insight
1060-135X,
46
, no.
11
, pp.
101
106
.
You do not currently have access to this content.