In light of the 2011 Fukushima disaster, recent discussion has focused on finding the best nuclear storage options, maximizing the oversight power of global institutions, and strengthening safety measures. In addition to these, the development of dependable liability coverage that can be tapped in an emergency is also needed and should be considered thoughtfully. To succeed, financing is essential using special-purpose instruments from the global bond market, which is as big as US$175 trillion. Thus, in this paper, for the first time, a two-coverage-type trigger nuclear catastrophe (N-CAT) risk bond for potentially supplementing the covering of U.S. commercial nuclear power plants (NPPs) beyond the coverage per the Price Anderson Act as amended, and potentially other plants are proposed and designed worldwide. The N-CAT peril is categorized by three risk layers: incident, accident, and major accident. The pricing formula is derived by using a semi-Markovian dependence structure in continuous time. A numerical application illustrates the main findings of the paper.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 2016
Research Papers
Toward Resilience to Nuclear Accidents: Financing Nuclear Liabilities via Catastrophe Risk Bonds
Bilal M. Ayyub,
Bilal M. Ayyub
Center for Technology and Systems Management,
e-mail: ba@umd.edu
University of Maryland
, College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: ba@umd.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Athanasios A. Pantelous,
Athanasios A. Pantelous
Department of Mathematical Sciences and
Institute for Risk and Uncertainty,
e-mail: A.Pantelous@liverpool.ac.uk
Institute for Risk and Uncertainty,
University of Liverpool
, Liverpool L69 7ZL
, UK
e-mail: A.Pantelous@liverpool.ac.uk
Search for other works by this author on:
Jia Shao
Jia Shao
Department of Mathematical Sciences and
Institute for Risk and Uncertainty,
e-mail: J.Shao1@liverpool.ac.uk
Institute for Risk and Uncertainty,
University of Liverpool
, Liverpool L69 7ZL
, UK
e-mail: J.Shao1@liverpool.ac.uk
Search for other works by this author on:
Bilal M. Ayyub
Center for Technology and Systems Management,
e-mail: ba@umd.edu
University of Maryland
, College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: ba@umd.edu
Athanasios A. Pantelous
Department of Mathematical Sciences and
Institute for Risk and Uncertainty,
e-mail: A.Pantelous@liverpool.ac.uk
Institute for Risk and Uncertainty,
University of Liverpool
, Liverpool L69 7ZL
, UK
e-mail: A.Pantelous@liverpool.ac.uk
Jia Shao
Department of Mathematical Sciences and
Institute for Risk and Uncertainty,
e-mail: J.Shao1@liverpool.ac.uk
Institute for Risk and Uncertainty,
University of Liverpool
, Liverpool L69 7ZL
, UK
e-mail: J.Shao1@liverpool.ac.uk
Manuscript received May 7, 2015; final manuscript received April 29, 2016; published online August 19, 2016. Assoc. Editor: James Lambert.
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. Dec 2016, 2(4): 041005 (9 pages)
Published Online: August 19, 2016
Article history
Received:
May 7, 2015
Revision Received:
April 29, 2016
Accepted:
April 29, 2016
Citation
Ayyub, B. M., Pantelous, A. A., and Shao, J. (August 19, 2016). "Toward Resilience to Nuclear Accidents: Financing Nuclear Liabilities via Catastrophe Risk Bonds." ASME. ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B. December 2016; 2(4): 041005. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033518
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Adaptative Kriging for Reliability Analysis of Sequential Simulation Models of Fatigue-Loaded Systems
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B
Special Section on Reliability Modeling and Assessment of Complex Engineering Systems with Mixed Uncertainty
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B
Balancing Interpretability and Uncertainty in Prognostic Models: A TOPSIS-Based Comparative Analysis of N-CMAPSS DS02 Methods
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (June 2025)
Mixed Uncertainty Analysis in Pressure Systems Inspection Applications
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (June 2025)
Related Articles
Quantitative Decisions Relative to Structural Integrity
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (January,1980)
Robust H -Infinity Control for a Premium Pricing Model With a Predefined Portfolio Strategy
ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Part B (June,2015)
Plant Life Management Models: A Comparison With Analysis of Impact on Both Safety and Nonsafety Issues
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (June,2011)
The Quantification of Risk in System Design
J. Eng. Ind (August,1983)
Articles from Part A: Civil Engineering
Distributionally Robust Budget Allocation for Earthquake Risk Mitigation in Buildings
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering (March,2024)
Practical Resilience Metrics for Planning, Design, and Decision Making
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering (September,2015)
Market Insurance and Self-Insurance through Retrofit: Analysis of Hurricane Risk in North Carolina
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering (March,2017)
Robust Modeling of Earthquake Catastrophe Risk for Insurance: An Integrated Approach Incorporating Active Faults and an Epidemic-Type Model
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering (December,2024)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Application of Probabilistic Methods for the Evaluation of Deterministic Deviations from Technical Specifications (PSAM-0277)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)
Czech & Slovakian Codes
Global Applications of the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code
Proposal of New Scheme of Science Communication through Repetitive Dialogue Forums (PSAM-0120)
Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management (PSAM)