The development of modern gas turbines is accompanied by an extensive prototype testing. To evaluate performance, the engines are fitted with a substantial number of sensors measuring pressures, temperatures, shaft speeds, etc. The test data are analyzed by procedures calculating data that are not directly measured, e.g., component efficiencies and turbine temperatures. Engine manufacturers usually apply such procedures for a detailed analysis after the test (off-line) as well as to ensure a safe and efficient engine operation during the test (on-line). Especially for the latter application, a fast and reliable assessment of the performance of the engine and its components as well as a fast and reliable detection of measurement faults are required. The paper describes a fully automated performance analysis procedure for off-line as well as on-line applications. The basis of the procedure is a full thermodynamic model representing the expected behavior of the engine to be tested. By such a model-based analysis procedure, a comparison between test data and the expected engine behavior is performed. The way the comparison is done allows detecting and isolating measurement faults and component malfunctions. In case of a detected measurement fault, the measurement will be excluded automatically from the analysis. At MTU Aero Engines GmbH the procedure is regularly applied for on-line and off-line test data analysis of different engine types. Compared to the procedures used thus far, many measurement faults can be detected quickly and reliably.

1.
RTO
, 2002, “
Performance Prediction and Simulation of Gas Turbine Engine Operation
,” AVT Working Group 018, RTO Technical Report No. TR-044, April.
2.
Kurzke
,
J.
, 1992, “
Calculation of Installation Effects Within Performance Computer Programs
,” AGARD-LS-183, pp.
7.1
7.19
.
3.
Selder
,
H.
, 1973,
Einführung in die Numerische Mathematik für Ingenieure
,
Carl Hanser Verlag
, München.
4.
AGARD
, 1983, “
Suitable Averaging Techniques in Non-Uniform Internal Flows
,” AGARD Working Group 14, AGARD-AR-182.
5.
Walsh
,
P. P.
, and
Fletcher
,
P.
, 1998,
Gas Turbine Performance
,
Blackwell
, London.
6.
Habrard
,
A. G.
, 1976, “
Characterization of Components Performance and Optimization of Matching in Jet-Engine Development
,” AGARD-LS-83, pp.
7.1
7.19
.
7.
Riegler
,
C.
,
Bauer
,
M.
, and
Schulte
,
H.
, 2003, “
Validation of a Mixed Flow Turbofan Performance Model in the Sub-Idle Operating Range
,” ASME Paper No. GT 2003-38223.
8.
1998, “
Test Uncertainty
,” ASME PTC 19.1-1998.
9.
Preinesberger
,
E.
, and
Mitterhuber
,
J.
, 2001, “
Anforderungen an die Systeme der neuen Generation zur Datenerfassung und Überwachung an Triebwerksprüfstände
,” DGLR-JT-2001-041.
10.
Gerlach
,
C.
,
Staudacher
,
S.
,
Filipovic
,
D.
, and
Lippl
,
F.
, 2005, “
CLEAN—Bench Adaptation and Test for a Complex Demo Engine Concept at ILA Stuttgart
,” ISABE-2005-1134, Sept.
You do not currently have access to this content.